226

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

I think we need daily doubles every week. Today ratting will drop you 2X kernels and plasma, next week it might be double efficiency on titanium mining etc. Easy to code and gives people a reason to log in. Also makes the game look full on once a week.

227

(12 replies, posted in General discussion)

The funny thing is if you talked to someone in the help channel or even general you would know that the majority of what you just said is bullshit. I won't bother to change your mind as I think its more a problem or your willingness to learn rather than the games willingness to teach.

What a will say is that this game allows you to reach the top echelon very quickly even as a solo player. It just requires brains determination and some time.

228

(27 replies, posted in General discussion)

I wondered why my symbiants weren't exploding

They arnt unique if they give them out every year.

230

(58 replies, posted in Balancing)

Simmy wrote:
Jita wrote:
Gremrod wrote:

I would make my way through the player built maze or death trap.

I just dont understand why you think that something is broken on beta but would work fine on gamma?

I dont even think its broken so much on beta.

Gamma, I can understand it's a different ball game. These are my main points why in gamma its not that much of a problem:

1. Beta has always been a roaming island and also the only pvp mission area.

2. There will be PBS in gamma so more defensive options are needed

3. There will be more options for your chosen PVP style if you don't like gamma you can always go to beta

4. Larger game world (hopefully) Id like to see at least 10-20 gamma and beta islands.

5. Gamma is something new, so can't really complain

This is hits btw but my point is when gamma comes into the game everyone who lives on beta will move to gamma. There will still be no pvp as betas will be empty in much the same way as low sec in eve. You dont fix the problem, you just move it to gamma and if anything make it worse as PBS will be easier to defend.

The only way this will be mitigated is by forcing corps which live on gamma to spend a significant amount of time on beta. Either that or creating an influx of players to beta. With the mechanics in place I can't see now either is possible.

wiki.eveuniversity.org/Fleet_User_Interface

That's a good place to start from.

I find it funny that devs STILL don't want to learn from eve. Visit some of the different alliances killboards and you will see that our killboard while usefull and great is always improvable.

the innovations a committed playerbase will implement with open wide ranging api are well worth it. killboards are just the tip of the iceberg.

At the end of the day with such a small dev team making as much of the game open source as possible is advantageous. The devs see it with the concept of the game - that's why its a sandbox. They see it with territory control which is why terraforming and walls will be used. Open your mind to the possibilities of API and other open source activities.

233

(41 replies, posted in General discussion)

Lemon wrote:

I was simply planning on building a few different style arena's for players to hold a couple tournmanets and if they wanted to call people out for some epic battles.

There are a few spots where i scouted that are large enough to build one for lights/assaults but very feew with a large enough area to build one for mechs.

Lemon asking for help.

Lemonade?

234

(65 replies, posted in General discussion)

Lemon tales of your incompetence are dull dull dull. Kindly pick up your lightsaber and commit seppuku.

atm on walls. I've found as a solo guy with around ten hours playtime that its pretty hard being self sufficient. that's with two five second rivelers and a good proto char too.

I think as a solo miner that the scarab helps as its less hauling journeys. I personally couldn't stand mining in Steve but I quite like it here, that said I think it could be made more active certainly liquids are pretty easy.

That said its kinda dangerous to make everything in game a struggle. You want some things to be able to be done while eating dinner or talki.g to the wife :-)

237

(38 replies, posted in General discussion)

0110011100001111001010001 wrote:
Atticus wrote:

Well, Binary loses the crown of worst troll ever on these forums. But my money was on you all along Jasdemi. Hopefully the Devs will realize your conduct, although done on a 3rd party site, is detrimental to the spirit of this game and act accordingly.

+1  Ban him...Now  neutral

But I am still the best troll btw.

+1

This type of OOG *** is the type of rubbish that spawned the script kiddie.

I have my first request cooking right now. Seems like something useful to do with my limited playtime.

Hello all,

I have the following tech available for prototype at cost price. Cost price is roughly 1250% of components section + t3 of item + build cost (less than 500k per)

Armor plate small t4
Armor plate medium t4

Armor repair small t4
Armor repair medium t4

Remote armor repair small t3
Remote armor repair medium t1

Chemical hardener t4
Kinetic hardener t4
Seismic hardener t3
Thermal hardener t4
Universal hardener t4

Light weight frame t4

Armor repair tuning t4

Shield generator small t4
Shield generator medium t4
Shield hardener t4

Energy transfer small t4
Energy transfer medium t4

Energy drainer small t4
Energy drainer medium t3

Energy neutralizer small t4
Energy neutralizer medium t4

Accumulator recharger t4

Corereactor t4

Auxiliary accumulator small t4
Auxiliary accumulator medium t4

Energy injector small t3
Energy injector medium t4

Evasive module t4

ERP kinetic t2
ERP siesmic t2
ERP thermal t1

Sensor amp t4
Remote sensor amp t4
Cargo scanner t4
Chassis scanner t4
Coprocessor t4
Range extenders t4
Signal detectors t3
Signal maskers t3
Target markers t4

Short range demob t4
Long range demob t3
ECM t4
Suppressor t4
ECCM t4
Interference module t4

Small miner t4
Medium miner t3

Industrial tuning t4

Geoscanner t4

Small harvester t4
Medium harvester t3

Weapons - all t4 apart from short range medium lasers and medium missile launchers

Magnetic tuning t2
Firearms tuning t4
Laser tuning t3
Missile tuning t3
Weapon stabilizer t4

Nexus:
Velocity t3
Assault t4
EW t4
Armor t4
Industrial t3
Farlock t4
Lock booster t4
Evasive t4
Repairer t4
Critical hit t3
Recharger t2
Fast extractor t2
Shield t3

If i'm not online mail me what you want and i'll provide exact quotes.

240

(17 replies, posted in General discussion)

That's constructive, thanks for your input.

241

(17 replies, posted in General discussion)

sorry binary, who's alt are you again? I dont have any proof, just a feeling I have really, coming from their adverts for publishers that have been there for some time and the lack of a coherent plan for making the game work long term. I don't think that its a bad thing, its just sad nobody has stepped forward to do it as the current team haven't the resources to make the game viable imo.

At this late stage they have two options I would like them to consider exploring.

The first is player investment. Since beta players have been offering to make an investment in the company. A thousand here and there maybe but it adds up and with reasonable terms I think they could raise a couple of hundred thousand. By reasonable terms I would mean no dividend and a percentage of the company with a 5 year buybuck.

The second is in some sort of affiliate scheme. Internet nerds with kickboxer girlfriends and ferrari's (like me ofc) would relish the opportunities to show their adwords fu. Set up a 20% take of the prospects monthly time fee and bringing in players becomes a second job for people. It costs the company virtually nothing and can be modified or withdrawn any time. The downside ofc is that 40% of the server isn't dumb as a brick and would do it for themselves but there are ways to prevent that. Right now they could add 1k players and keep the same overhead. The opportunity cost of NOT doing this is great.

242

(17 replies, posted in General discussion)

they built this game with the hope that someone would come in and buy it off them. I don't think they had any intention of running it as a going concern.

well their CEO's email is gaben@valvesoftware.com. I suggest we all ask him nicely to allow the game on steam.

your forgetting that money can't buy success in this game without a market

245

(40 replies, posted in Balancing)

bump for problem that's still around

Eve has shown that easy logistics are bad for the game. I dont get why people are talking about a lwf big_smile its clear its going to be a shield and four hardeners otherwise any spy escorting in a kain is gonna down half a bil in stuff.

247

(79 replies, posted in General discussion)

Your pretty full of guano serpens.  Ill create a soundboard this weekend of all the audio recordings I have of the leadership advocating account sharing. Of course it was widespread.

The problem wasn't this , it goes on in every corp, the problem is the knee jerk reactions of the dev team punishing the one account not even widely shared rather than a balanced appropriate response across the server.

I dont think folks are claiming they were good ss gold, just that the response was poor.

248

(79 replies, posted in General discussion)

no I think you will find that I'm not mistaken but heard several people asked a direct question of if they are able to use more accounts as they can be given miners.

249

(79 replies, posted in General discussion)

Norrdec wrote:
Sundial wrote:

Every corp in the game has probably done account sharing in one form or another.

The fact is CIR did it for a substantial PvP advantage with early access accounts and that is in my opinion when it becomes an issue.
We don't have any people with early access accounts. We did not share pvp accounts. The banned shared account was accessed from a secondary computer on a desk, 1m from the primary computer.


What CIR did was unfair but that doesn't mean that every single instance of account sharing is suddenly wrong. Its simply not completely batshit ***.
So EULA is good as long it hits your enemies lol

You are overstating the scale of "the problem" in CIR a bit.
lol

as someone who has been in CIR for a short time I know this to be a lie. I have regularly heard Syndic asking miners "if they want another couple of mining accounts" as well as lemon, bibi and many others openly discussing account sharing. I'm sure every corp is the same, don't lie about it if your going anyway.

250

(79 replies, posted in General discussion)

Tbh there are better games to play where you dont get this rubbish.

My girlfriend said *edit: Inappropriate. - DEV Zoom we take on holiday if I stop talking about  my Xbox.

Yahoo! Skyrim.