Bombs are for walls, not for PVP.

Good, but has to be visually realistic. And terraformable

Same idea applies to movement speed and was suggested a few times.

All the new stuff suddenly lost its appeal. It's player bought structures, not player built.

All was said already in I2.0 thread. Don't feel like repeating it.

I would also like a read-only folder access type, in addition to full and write-only we have now.

NO corp standing to NPC. it was the worst EVE mechanic evar.

I'd prefer shield-penetrating ammo and/or weapons. That would be available blue/yellow pilots.

Somehow, shore-to-shore transport sounds awesome to me. (Or shore-to-shore mobile teleport).
You can't just drop it into the current system, but it will shine as a part of a global trabsportation system rebalance.

Ragequit is expected but stating your reason would be nice anyway.

EVE taught us why this model sucks. Google "moons" and "ice" if you don't have first-hand experience.

Final cost of production, ability to sustain PVP.

Before ragequitting I'll put a list of steps necessary to fix the [s]completely broken[/s] incorrectly balanced system within the current framework:

1) Remove outpost lockdown completely, like it never existed. It will also automatically solve alliance problem (at least the largest part of it).
2) SAP attack time and SAP defence time should be equal, forces necessary for capture and defence should also be equal. This will move stability balance to 50 and allow to maintain facility levels (at least) comparable to the previous system.
3) The whole intrusion event should not consume more than 30 minutes of game time per day. One 20-30-min event daily would be reasonable and will reduce burnout.
4) Optionally (and the only benefit for defender): allow outpost owners to move the next event +-1 hr relative to the scanned time. This should reduce alarm clocking, but will disadvantage the attacker.