You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Active topics Unanswered topics
Search options (Page 3 of 10)
Khader Khan wrote:Its clearly apparent they are far to much hassle now that you will likely only get 1-3 loot boxes from the whole thing. Due to AOE explosion......
Wait why don't we just stop AOE explosion from happening on NPC all together.
Or just remove it totally? They have already neutered one of the few unique things this game has from eve.
Jita wrote:Stranger Danger wrote:Jita wrote:I can see why you would try to paint others with your rather murky brush laughable as the attempt is.
Almost as funny as how desperately you are trying to hurt your enemies with dev intervention vs fighting them in game.
Actually us shutting down the ability to get these crazy amounts of stuff hurts us more than any of you because we haven't done it and corps like 77 CIR and STC have abused the hell out of it. Thus gives us a stuff disadvantage.
Its the right thing for the game so I couldn't care less.
If there is one thing you are known for its always looking out for the future of the game; certainly not HHNs and Fingers of God.
Rage Blackout wrote:yay
lol you just ended people ever doing NPCs on beta or gamma "NPCs destroyed by AoE explosion damage will not drop loot anymore."
Thats like 10 Atom bombs fix
Can't quote this enough. Way too heavy handed as always.
Any notes? Does this finally fix the rubberbanding issue?
Annihilator wrote:yes! remove content! 
Yes, remove terrible content that causes players to throw up their hands and leave. How controversial of an opinion. Take your trolls elsewhere, you dont even play this game.
Also remove the geoscanner and artifact scanner combat missions. We shouldn't need to say things like this but here we are.
Ville wrote:While we are talking about balancing missions, can we get the combat missions that drop items that weigh oh... 50 U to a more realistic value so my Mesmer can carry it? The most *** thing in the world is killing something, getting it to drop and running back to station getting into a sequer then hauling it back to station.
We mathed it out last night in TS and it is literally faster to use a Lithus with a machine gun than do all the walking. Fix this kind of crap that runs players out of the game before bothering to balance transport missions.
No its not just be better than them ffs we do it on a weekly if not daily basis. Im sorry your bros arent logging in for you to fight with, come join PHM and sit at the cool kids table.
Celebro wrote:Syndic wrote: I care and think about the gaming experience of every single person in my corporation, and go out of my way to find ways to make the game entertaining and fun for them.
If you care enough about your players, you should provide them with targets on the long term, not short term, and make others all leave. If you care about your players you should care about the game too, if you still want it to be entertaining for your members.
We will not stop playing because you are *** at the game. That is all.
Annihilator wrote:Ville wrote:L10 skills, 2ECCMs the ecm pilot is useless.
how much under fleet conditions with 50% interference dropping sensor strength down?
Now that we have your expertise, how about under conditions of never undocking?
Ozy wrote:Stranger Danger wrote:The problem with ewar is one group of people uses them well, while other groups cant grasp it beyond the assumption that its OP and its not their fault for improperly using them.
Always good for an amusing post, Stranger. It's a bit megalomaniac and ridiculous to assume that all these posts are due to CIR using ewar.
P.S. Why has nothing new been implemented yet 
Because nothing is broken
Anni I can't think of a nice way of saying I wish you would uninstall perp and delete this forum from your browser favorites.
Burial wrote:Our alliance island Xiantor? I think someone needs to explain why their turrets initially shot us then.
Because of dumb Hungarians, for one reason or another.
Ozy wrote:Nice initiative! A low ep bracket could be interesting if (and that's doubtful) enough teams sign up for it. Point allocation sounds good too, but you forgot to assign a point value to the reward heavies from the last tournament. It's unlikely that someone's gonna bring em unless more are up for grabs, but they should probably still be included in the point table. As their masking is somewhat ridiculous, giving them a super-high point value or even limiting them to be flagships only seems appropriate.
Seems a awful odd thing to fixate on.
DEV Zoom wrote:So um, do I have to state in every such topic that there won't be a wipe or can we take that as a default?
Its just wishful thinking by a lot of folks who see it as their only way to catch up. Easier to spam tickets/forums than to play the game.
Serpens wrote:I'll take your response as you concede defeat. Good day sir.
And I'll take your still being in JOKE as proof that its officers don't give a *** about the giant dump you took on your former allies. Lack of respect? You are a big example of why they dont get any.
Sky Fox wrote:Rex Amelius wrote:I appreciate seeing some new voices on the forums addressing issues
WE HAVE BEEN JUMPING UP AND DOWN WAVING OUR HANDS ABOUT
Sparks sparks sparks coupled now with fewer islands right in time for Steam.
I appreciate the concept of limiting control of the map by one power and agree 100% that it's terrible for the game. I do not believe for one second that any kind of corp cap will solve it. There is a 50+ page thread discussing Instant Power Projection but Zoom is too stubborn to see the issue.
Zoom here are your options.
Triple the island count (including gamma) and make 3 max sparks including Home Base with distance limitation.
Or Reset all EP and have this same *** problem in 3 years.
Thank you for the good response, you are definitely right.
Removal of spark teleport and greater distance would also increase productivity towards more stable corps and better more exciting PvP
If you want to get PvP then why take the stations, surely farming us on an island where you know were going to be is more fun than just running us back to alpha and crushing moral, and yet again reducing an active corp into a inactive corp, which you have succeeded in doing.
The strategy is very silly and seems very counter productive for cir and co to actually have fun, ganking miners etc...
Do not pin this on us. We warned you OVER AND OVER to stay out of Vet affairs. But Skymotion decided he HAD to take his little swinging *** into the fray and he got burned for it.
That said, we welcome all CONS refugees into PHM with open arms. We do not hold you accountable for the sins of the father and are willing to teach you the ways to play the game the right way.
Serpens wrote:lol It's hilarious to see you STILL going on about that. I wonder if you wake up in a cold sweat every night, cursing my name and shaking your fist at the sky. bahahaha Go delete your own account and make up more stories kid, cause this one is old and frail.
See: Villes quote about joke recruitment scraping the bottom of the barrel
Serpens wrote:Wow calm down you little turd JESUS CHRIST ITS A GAME HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Why don't you delete an account about it?
CONS had their chance to not get drawn into this. Instead they ignored the entire servers advice and dove right in. Now their members spam the forums nonstop asking for game mechanic changes because sky motion Bradley couldn't listen.
Or just undock and take the islands. We warned you to stay out of Veteran Affairs, this is what you get.
Hasn't Eve been ripped off wholesale enough already?
Ensireka wrote:I think Deminyon has a good point. Balancing my arse. Other t4 weapons get more ammo capacity, so don't give that bs.
Have you ever fired a single medium weapon in this game?
I've figured out how to alleviate the power of the alliance: undock and fight, don't spam tickets.
Goddamn less than two months in the game and CONs is turning into STC.
Don't make the game any easier tia.
Posts found: 51 to 75 of 244
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
Generated in 0.089 seconds (92% PHP - 8% DB) with 7 queries
