You see your name there if you are logged in when you make the fit, and also when it was made.

If you want to avoid people knowing what you use for pvp, then simply upload 5 variations that you use, and they will not know which one you are in.

Finally knowing that you sometimes fit, e.g. a Prometheus with 4 Neuts and a demob, can make other people think twice about attacking you in the first place

I have been talking to corp members that have played longer than me and am starting to note down what fits they use for different situations, although many of them are private simply because I didn't ask and can still share them on the corp boards via a url.

I will ask if I can make them all public.

I think he was talking of 100% efficiency relative to the cost to manufacture the item rather than the 'book value' which can also be modified by production extensions.

Say the item's book value is 100 Epri (what you see on the info tab).

Add in production skills and you can reduce it's cost to 80 Epri.

Now recycle it at say 90% of book value and you get 90 Epri back.

Spend 80 of those making a new one, keep 10 as profit. [All numbers made up and argument might be lies, just an explanation]

I assume that was what Annihilator was referring to.

If this exploit was the case then clearly the bonuses provided by the beta facility are too extreme. Now if the amount of bonus the beta gives relative to the alpha was ok, then shift the whole scale, but nerfing a single Extension seems a bit of a blunt way to remove an exploit or rebalance recycling, and to then not refund the points seems doubly harsh.

Yep they seem to have fixed it at least.

Now you can't login while in standby-mode you just get a message (That Alexander posted above) instead of the broken character select screen you used to get.

Ah well, time to make another ticket for another container while I wait I guess ...

I saw some people were using their free addsense words to plug perp, seemed like a pretty good choice of keywords

So you make long ranty negative posts about stuff you don't like, in an attack on the devs basically saying "Why did you even bother doing all this what I want is XYZ" and then claim you are not disagreeing? It is a step in the right direction?

And how it can be Cheesy to announce walls first? "Yeah I agree, everyone announces the walls first, game devs have been doing it for years it is just a total copy and paste of all the other games that announce the walls first. So cheesy!"?

I get the impression most of your posts are just trolls and rants, but at least they are generally not as schizophrenic as these ones.

Personally I think the new features are very interesting. The chance to terraform your islands and control the access and mobility of other players will be interesting, the need to leave people afk at the gates is removed and the whole dynamic of the beta islands will be changed with the increased detection and teleportation options.

I can totaly see things ending up there, but thinking of things from a Dev point of view it makes a lot more sense to start with them seeded. That way if they need to change the way they work or rebalance them they can simply stop seeding the old ones and start seeding new ones.

If players have gone out and farmed kernels etc and are producing them, then patching becomes a much bigger problem as well as the negative side effects of removing toys that people have gone out of their way to learn to make and then possibly not replacing them with something they like (or anything at all).

Once things are stable and working I can imagine them adding specific kernels or ways to learn to produce them. Look at the number of iterations Intrusion has gone through for example...

Patch Notes:
http://www.perpetuum-online.com/Changelog:2011-12-23

The general standard of posts here is pretty low, and people are often trying to have a go at someone or something rather than being helpful / constructive / genuine.

There have been many many posts that simply can't go anywhere or have no real meaning and they have been closed.

Take for example your first comment :"our clients ... have no way to air their grievances over wrongs real or perceived." what did you actually mean by that? It is patently false, you can post here (as you yourself just did), you can PM a dev, you can write a support ticket etc etc etc.

When people get upset they often write gibberish, and I am happy that the discussions that evolve out of gibberish get closed, as it saves me the trouble of reading them.

The devs have a huge amount of interaction with the player base, posting here, taking in general, responding to comments on their blog posts etc. You have no idea how lucky you are compared to many other larger games where your posts are simply ignored, or some minimum wage Customer Relations employee who has no real idea what is going on simply posts a generic "your concerns will be raised at the next blablabla meeting" and goes nowhere.

Take the docking times posts from the other day, the actual devs that will be involved in finding the bug are responding to the posts and getting involved in the discussion. That is awesome. Now compare the feed back there to the pages and pages of "lets just troll the devs about some decision that they can't discuss in public" and are you surprised they get locked.

Was on the support ticket for assignment II.