I liked the autofit tool too!

2

(7 replies, posted in General discussion)

I just want to say you said I won something and then accepted a higher bid and that makes you untrustworthy and bad and ***

*edit: Offensive. - DEV Zoom

3

(122 replies, posted in General discussion)

Well you can definitely strum it!

4

(17 replies, posted in Open discussion)

I imagine you would just have a duel boot option on your pc

5

(42 replies, posted in General discussion)

Awww yiss

Mutha - *** breadcrumbs!

6

(32 replies, posted in Q & A)

No they don't, they had one guy and he left a long time ago.

7

(32 replies, posted in Q & A)

Yet another industry update that makes it harder for new players and vets alike that nobody actually asked for. Awesome, can't wait.

8

(25 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

Confirming what *** said. My base's walls are built using this meaning you can't terraform in.

I've talked in general chat about this a while. Using this 'feature' its possible to build an island that's impossible to assault. Not just difficult - impossible.

Broken mechanics.

9

(23 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

The only gamma fix I could see would be soil erosion that would flatten walls over time.

10

(38 replies, posted in Bugs)

Detector cycle lag is over 9000 if you have the squad will window open and usually minimal without.

11

(57 replies, posted in General discussion)

Emphasis on the 'we'

I.e. undock and 'we' will dogpile you until you give up

12

(57 replies, posted in General discussion)

Truth is often in the eye of the beholder but bottom line is nebs and stc do the same as cir even though they talk *** about them all the time.

13

(33 replies, posted in General discussion)

I'm of the opinion it should start kinda theme park and then get steadily more sandbox. If you wanted to get put of the park in the sand you should have the option but let's ease folks in at the beginning.

14

(8 replies, posted in Balancing)

I just think trials shouldn't be on gamma tbh. Its end game content and too easily abused.

15

(33 replies, posted in General discussion)

DEV Zoom wrote:

1. We'll try to think of something, but we're open to suggestions as well.

2. These new bugs have now set us back by at least a week, but they happened due to some internal rewrites which help us stay more future-proof in return. Research is coming along nicely, Steam too, but we can't talk about the latter until we have everything set up, sorry. Missions and the rest comes after we deployed research.

3. We have other plans, we'll announce it when we get there.

Any thoughts on an affiliate scheme?

16

(23 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Remove epi from gamma
Reduce maximum sparks to five with a 1 hour cool down
Remove instant respawn for ore fields

Might help some

17

(57 replies, posted in General discussion)

1) nebs and stc lost all the fights but won the war. They basically alarm clocked until cir, 12, 62nd and assorted people from other corps got bored and went to play other games and then took undefended betas. Building on this they have already destroyed 12's undefended gamma base and stated their aim to do the same to the rest

2) independent gamma was established but appears that woefully underused.

3) nobody got bans, ville got a forum ban and chat ban but that's it. They left due to boredom after winning the fights and then not getting any Pvp as stc and nebs stopped turning up.

4) population is real low due mainly to the crappy intrusion system driving away players, natural attrition to real life not being offset by enough new blood, gamma base deaths killing corps like Rawr and the devs seeming indifference as to what creates a population. Pvp therefore is low.

18

(9 replies, posted in Q & A)

I guess someone gifted you a US account?

Regardless just use one account to buy two subs and problem solved. What's irritating is that due to conversion rates US players pay less than the UK.

19

(188 replies, posted in News and information)

Tbh I'm too tired of the game to grind another six months to get back what I already had. Time to move on.

20

(188 replies, posted in News and information)

Tbh celebro I think its time all t1 and 2 were seeded anyway with all mechs and bots.

21

(24 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

If they were say 10% faster then that would be worth having. Skirmish bots ftw

22

(24 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Merkle wrote:
Fourfingers Frankie wrote:

Or at least be in line with the proto gear and make them faster.

Anything but a third tier of the same robot for greater cost than a mk 2 would be awesome.

Absolutely, this would make common sense.  I'm assuming, however, that this is already the plan as T2 proto's are less weight and are easier to fit.

But if the proto mech weighed less it would actually be slower due to the added weight ratio

23

(24 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Or at least be in line with the proto gear and make them faster.

Anything but a third tier of the same robot for greater cost than a mk 2 would be awesome.

24

(188 replies, posted in News and information)

What I will never understand is why they feel the need to *** industrialists over with every patch. I mean who thought it was a good idea to make everyone's research worth less? I understand making a system for new players and not existing but why *** the existing guys over in the process?

25

(188 replies, posted in News and information)

Even without extensions a change reducing the level of already gained research sucks tbh. Balance fragments and I could live with it :-)