What's next? Robo pandas?

... with sound effects.

I always thought half of the entertaining part of EW is remembering which module is on who.

So perhaps since you wanted the best for the game STC should have complained about broken stuff instead of ignoring and/or ab/using it as a clutch?

I find it hard to understand that people who have been pvping for a long time are arguing in favour a mechanic that lets people disengage at will, safely and with no tradeoffs. 

The logical conclusion here is that these "pvpers", again, want to be able to disengage at will, safely and with no tradeoffs because they are both scared and unable to think beyond *** frontal Light Brigade charges.

What's next? Arguing in favor of duping bots because it "promotes pvp" and because otherwise the side with stronger numbers has more resource acquisition power so since you are ess you demand to be able to magically mine more per cycle in order to not favour the "blob"? Making you competitive through developer favour?

I'm sorry for the few STC members and others who have to put up this facade and argue for this obviously broken mechanic just because the rest of their corp members are a disaster and have the balls and brains the size of a raisin. You should see the signs of where your corp is going. And not going.

Not really, lets take classic windows for a few counter examples. Open a folder in windows. Press but don't release on a file. It gets selected on press not on release. Press on empty space and drag. It selects the file on the same line and wherever you drag. Same with start menu. Press, it gets opened. Menus are slightly different in that button press still opens the menu, but release selects the element in the menu.

Listboxes in a browser usually work the same way, registering on press rather than release unlike say your submit button. Given the elements in the targeting computer are a list of items and not a button it should select on press and not on release.

I want(ed) an ECM module that actually shows on the killboard

If your bottleneck is man hours available for processing the logs (assuming they actually show anything...) you automate it. Making people check logs manually is a pain in the ***, and error prone, but you know that already

I hope you realize how stupid is that all you need is a [S]photoshopped[/S] screenshot because the "logs show nothing". But that's ok, it was unfortunately pretty obvious where the "thorough investigation" was going to lead to anyway.

For starters you do not add attributes to the object, you create another table with an object id and a repairer id. Given the module drop rate it is easy to figure a limit. If ancient MMOs could do it I'm sure in 2013 we can spare a few bytes similarly to what ancient MMOs did. Anyway enough armchair deving, the devs are the ones who have the metrics.

Maybe one day I'll tell you how that happened. It is kind of amusing because the devs changed the input box that day, and it is amusing because it was opened totally legally and that gets them to change the code, but when other people cheat they just go meeeh too many to ban, whatever. Play legally get slapped in the face. Play like a *** and ruin the game environment and bleh.

Seriously, If i wanted to cheat at this thing I wouldn't write a *** autohotkey macro