1 Reply by Sad Panda

(114 replies, posted in Q & A)

The sad thing is that a lot of players are more concerned about playing the system, instead of playing the game. Hopefully this will be less of a problem when we get more stuff to do, or maybe i'm just being naive here.

Go to forum: Q & A

2 Reply by Sad Panda

(26 replies, posted in Q & A)

Ville wrote:

I don't want my money or the corps money back for the walls.  I just wanted more epi within my walls sad

From now on your name shall be FarmVille!

Go to forum: Q & A

3 Reply by Sad Panda

(10 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

0110011100001111001010001 wrote:

Maybe instead of adding ACC add something else.

Hmm... I know! It should add armor! So you can heal while you heal! How's that!

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

4 Reply by Sad Panda

(33 replies, posted in General discussion)

Good luck guys, I've heard this really worked out in that other game too!

Go to forum: General discussion

5 Reply by Sad Panda

(19 replies, posted in General discussion)

You say that like if it were some ancillary thing, but "new players", "small corps" and "small gangs" is a quite notable part of the playerbase I think.

Go to forum: General discussion

6 Reply by Sad Panda

(19 replies, posted in General discussion)

So... I guess they can now... *drumroll* assault you. yikes

Go to forum: General discussion

7 Reply by Sad Panda

(104 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Crepitus wrote:

conclusion: soloist beaten down; group nerfed but more people farming can compensate for the loss.  all players lose either way, especially with certain corps already far ahead of the curve having not been hurt by this nerf since their tech trees are already quite full of t4 fruit wink

"more people farming can compensate for the loss" isn't really an argument since more people could have farmed even more kernels before the nerf too.

You make it sound like there would be a fixed rate at which players HAVE to farm kernels otherwise something bad happens smile

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

8 Reply by Sad Panda

(104 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Crepitus wrote:

Considering the recent Dev post talking about catering to lone-wolf carebears this is a *very* counter-intuitive move on their part.

While I don't like this change either (seriously, which nerf is good?), I don't really see how this makes a difference for solo and group play.

Before:
Solo - 100% kernel drops
Group - 100% kernel drops

After:
Solo - 50% kernel drops
Group - 50% kernel drops

It has been slowed down for everyone. Grinding was faster in groups before the patch too, and that hasn't changed.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

9 Reply by Sad Panda

(92 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jelan wrote:

It categorically wasnt illegal and wasnt an exploit and therefore open to be used as intended.

lol you mean the devs intended insurance to be a money printing machine? nice troll lol

Go to forum: General discussion

10 Reply by Sad Panda

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

I like ghosts. Are there any trolls in your town too?

Go to forum: General discussion

11 Reply by Sad Panda

(3 replies, posted in Q & A)

умад?

Go to forum: Q & A

12 Reply by Sad Panda

(27 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

sad

Go to forum: Resolved bugs and features

13 Reply by Sad Panda

(42 replies, posted in General discussion)

Qual wrote:

Funny thing is that stEVE never did it. Not even once.

Hmm.

Go to forum: General discussion