The super annoyance of having to get to that termianl and post the job with identical conditnos makes me care enough to read those yes. Just because smoeone didn't bother to read the conditions before accpeting.

Exact or approximate probability distribution of when the SAP is opening given a scan and an accuracy. I have moderate reasons to think the models I curretnly have don't match the actual behaviour.

It would be nice to have the PvP portion but to my surprise I am almost defeate4d by the PvE portion .

Is the probabilty distirbution uniform within the margins? If it is some kind of a bell curve then having a percent represent the accuracy is misleading. I have a reports of 99% scans almost always be within 1 minute of the SAP time, way more accurate that the presented % math would give basis for.

I think that is overtly generous. You should have only be allowed to choose which skill you wanted to preserve. I fyou want to have EP be timeslved you can't have too much events where you suddenly quadruple some portion of your EP.

As handled elsewhere you are not entitled to keep absolute progress between patches. Now if you wanted a % of  how much bigger the new skill tree is compared to the old one then maybe. But still I expect that this would be peanuts compared to the outrageous greed.

CIR has a polarising effect yes. however if that poliriing effect were not there a whole lot of now supressed dynamics would rear their head (instead of lack of action as proposed).

Correspondingly there should not be anything to screw up about vet EP.

You can't fix veterans eing able to tank EP by keeping the skill sthe same or increasing them. Only maybe by having a skill that would make sens eofr anew bie but a vetran woudl not put EP in. Bu taht kind of skill would cause separate griefs.

The only way the patch woudl be "good" in this way woudl be if the skills were merged and more EP would flow to the EP dams. But that qould cause a lot more qq than this. Thus it is hypocritical to count this fact alone as being a flaw in the patch.

As an inheritor let me comment:
*Indy decapitation: There is nothing but indy carebarea around for 50% of the server. Doesn't seem to be dying but rather thriving.
*Faction rating seemed easy to grind. You just complaining about your sudden state drop rather than system improvement (in case the rating used to be global then I guess I am perfectly fine using only rating of one color)
* walls and probes: the little i have seen probes they seem like okay thing to do. If I would encounter more waves if there were less probes the siutaiton would be sillier.
* the wide selection of modules seemed to me like most served a purpose and were natural fits. I have a little hard time believing not everyting was in form the start (such as having some tunings but not others).

ERP I can't say about because I haven't touched them that lot

A NERF is not a tool and not an error state in itself. You can get equivalaent effect by buffing everything else than by nerfing a single thing. You just interpreted as if you somehow lost something when 1) the nerfs were universal everybody lost the same amount so no relative potential level change 2) You evaluate goods in a economy/mechanics that nolonger exist. If every hp and damage number were divided bv 10 you don't get 10 times worse goods. You have to evaluate within the new context. To my tally most of the NERF were succesful and the you compaining that everything is gettign nerfed is emotional incompetency of being irrationally attached to numbers regardless of their meaning.

And if changing numbers is easy so should have this. And it feels taht a bigger number shuffle around would have required strictly greater effort. There is no new art or engine functionality added with this change either. Jita you also suggest making new equipment roles, that is a form of specailization. Thus your argument that what you would suggest should be the course of action would be stirctly less effort falls short and it is kinda tempting to draw the opposite conlusion taht it would be strictly more effort.