1 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(9 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

+1

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

2 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(2 replies, posted in Balancing)

Annihilator wrote:
Patch 2012-07-18 wrote:

why?

you already broke with your principles to not copy&paste meshes when you implemented TF and construction modules.

WHY THE HELL did you then not also the same to implement Terraforming and construction Robots?
Why did you make my specialisation into ARMORTANKING Harvester a bunch of wasted EP??

gimme my resist bonus back!

And today 2012-09-16...
why?
Why you so slow Anni? Or you was busy whining for other things?

Go to forum: Balancing

3 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(49 replies, posted in News and information)

When can we expect the next patch(new bots, new equipment)?

Go to forum: News and information

4 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(31 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Annihilator wrote:
Norrdec wrote:

I would go for a repper with a slow passive and good active repairs.

that would be a compromise solution, but not a bit helping.

lets sum up - everyone against this, is ok with:

- solo-roaming has no place in perp
- solo-pve has no place in perp
- shields are pvp only equip, and in pve only a choice for vets in heavy mechs
- every game mechanic should be only availiable with modules, so logically,
+the passive resist bonus on yellow bots should not work without fitting at least an universal armor plate,
+ the mining bonuses of mining bots should only boost industrial tunings
+ the masking bonus of ewar bots should only be applied to masking modules, not the bot itself
+ recharge bonus of pelistal bots should not be applied without a recharger fitted
+ locktime bonus of pelsital bost should not be applied without a sensor amp fitted.

guys, your to hardcore with your "bind everything to a module". especially SELF REPAIR or Heal is a basic component in every RPG. having it only avialiable by fitting a certain module is more or less a joke....

We don't need all this stuff. All we need is to return Armor Repairer Tunings and ERP back. That's all.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

5 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(27 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Burial wrote:

What are you talking about? How would that serve me when smaller factions move to gamma? Its the opposite of it if you think about it.

Ok. Lets imagine that small faction reach Gamma island. This small group spend a LOT of resources and NIC to build the base. What they gonna do after that? How they gonna defend this base?

Can you answer this questions?

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(14 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jelan wrote:
Serpens wrote:

lol

Like a bad smell, he appears lol.  You still hanging around here, cant quite let go can you, if you put an app into M2S we might consider you, unlikely but you can try you brave little soldier you.

LOL Better prey Lolpus to take again CEO of your fail corp! But I don't think he will.
And what about Serpens, if he want he can put app to more successful corps, like MORTE or CHAOS.

Go to forum: General discussion

7 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(112 replies, posted in Balancing)

And after that, nerf everything again, just to be sure...

Go to forum: Balancing

8 Reply by Critical SnipeR

(112 replies, posted in Balancing)

Sundial wrote:
Annihilator wrote:

then mesmer (omg, it can kill mechs with one salvo!)
then riveler mk2 (imba mining machine)
then zenith... has just to much range with its deadly demob... through hills
then vagabond - has just to high chance to ecm... through hills
then waspish - has just to high range for an assault bot.
then arkhe - its just to cheap
then ERP, because
then RR, because it makes heavy mechs live longer!

nerf the scarab, it carries too much

+1

Go to forum: Balancing