1 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(11 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

No, go back to Eve.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

2 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(18 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Johnny EvilGuy wrote:

Dude, your chin!

I get 5% level of extra yield epriton mining with this chin, back to your cage boy.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

3 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(18 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

AeonThePiglet wrote:

I'm in favor of trial accounts having no limitations other than a max size of assault bot and an inability to whisper or create channels. They should be able to do everything else just fine so that new players get a better idea what exactly goes on in the game.


This would be so exploitable it would be funny.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

4 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(92 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Unbelievable, you have utter contempt for this game Syndic, not content with forcing smaller, independent corporations out of the game and griefing new players, you want to be able to blob with impunity.

You say this is for intrusions and the ability to defend, well i can see past your spin and know this is desired by yourself so you can Blob anyones outpost that you do not want on beta/ doesn't kow tow to your will.


You and your ilk are killing the game, grow up.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

5 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(92 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Dev Blog


While we have no problem with people banding together as they see fit, we don’t want that banding together to be the “one correct option”


Syndic


What people are asking for is game-mechanic support for people who wish to band together as they see fit


So you do want that to be the "one correct option"



Do not take this the wrong way but the game population atm does not support a method for herding cats as you seem to want, when the server population hopefully becomes much larger and player retention is up these 'cat herding' tools can and most probably will be implemented.


At this point in the games development we need Dev time to be spent on features that benefit player retention and new player experiences, the PVE for example needs a ton of work, that will help subscriptions to rise, thus enabling ideas like Williams to be floated.


Just not at this point Syndic, put your effort into ideas that will help the game grow, not cat herding tools that only encourage "one correct method", that is for later.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6 Reply by Paranoid Marvin

(92 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

DrZli wrote:

you DO realize that this tool benefits smaller corps/alliances more than big ones? oO

Smaller corps can work together as is, standings can be set as is, why would they need alliance type tools?

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests