Obi Wan Kenobi wrote:Karl Krieger wrote:And i agree,every murder should be treated equal, but to me i feel like these people need not have died if people in charge had taken the neccesary precautions. How can you place these civilians in what is basically still a war-torn country and not expect this to happen atleast once? Was their only plan an alternate safe house? Cause obviously that didnt work.
Yeah your so right but sadly it would seem in this situation it was to little. The sad fact is people tend to be *** prefering to react rather than be proactive. After all why spend money unless you have to
Agreed, that is the good side of putting names and faces on people because its easy for those in charge to see numbers instead of faces,families,potential,and all the rest wich is lost.
I understand where Zortarg is coming from politically, but this guy was there as a civilian and not a soldier.
If you only want to compare numbers then yes, many countries have suffered very cruely at the will of the american armed forces. Generally though,every country wants to have embassys of their own in other countries as well as their own embassys all over the world. Including places like iran,egypt etc. Embassys are not part of an invading force,if anything a country should be worried only when embassys start pulling out. But that is a political discussion.
This man(and many others at the embassy too) was a civilian,taking a risk in what is pretty much still a war-zone and he was killed because of a movie,or possibly some other motive with the movie protest as a cover.
On an individual level this is both tragic and unneccesary. On a political level, well, that is best discussed elsewhere because this man already paid in full for any wrong any one may accuse him of,so has anyone who is now dead. My opinion.