I know, but you must not be able to destroy stuff when outside of terminal at all - only to drop it in some temporary container with small timeout (to not load the server much).
Because victim can destroy valuable stuff before he is aggroed (when he saw someone approaching on radar, or when his convoy died but he personally is not yet aggroed).

I'm using these keys too. My thoughts is not about mouse locking at all - you can apply them to using keyboard too.

What I mean in (1) and (2) is that if you have multiple locked targets and first of them dies, second one must automatically become primary. After all, you already locked it - why you must additionally make it primary, additionally to hitting "space" (shoot)?

No problem - just don't shoot at the friend and make another locked enemy primary.

Because you locked all targets for something. If that "something" is just seeing/remrepping/boosting (or other activity which doesn't require primary target) - no problem, my proposed change doesn't interfere with that.
But if it's shooting (the most common action in PVP and PVE) - you must be able to shoot at next target - after all, it's why you locked it! If you want to shoot at another locked target (which is called by FC / more suitable by combat situation) - no problem, make it primary manually as currently.

No problem - select it. But you can lock secondary target before primary is dead and in my case you will not have to select it as primary. It is very convenient in PVE and PVP.

No problem - just unlock them as you do currently. My proposed change does not interfere with that.

Thanks.

Thanks.

It's good if it's already implemented.

No, any instancing in shared world game is bad thing, because it limits player interactions (both friendly and unfriendly).

actually, it would be nice if player would drop plasma... - just not from arkhes.

WTB Alexander plasma and put it into the energy-transfer station as sacrifice.

A lot of good suggestions. Here's my feedback.

USABILITY

Disagree:

1. If no targets are locked, first locked target must become primary

Bad idea. Maybe you could have a toggle for allowing this option. But when you are pvping, you need to control exactly which targets are primary and which are secondary, it should NOT be automated.

2. Doubleclicking on non-locked entity in "Landmarks" window should not make it primary target if there is already one. If there is no primary or that entity is locked, it must become primary target.

Absolutely not. In pvp when your squad leader calls a primary you need to be able to lock it instantly from the landmarks list. Adding an extra click or keybind to this process is totally counterproductive.

14. Add buyer/seller name to market transactions window.

Why? I actually think making an in-game buyer/seller account with the market would be cool...the player could make that his own name or something different. Or having market transaction IDs that are random alpha numeric codes. So you can see which sellers and buyers are doing what, but not who they are.

21. If module is active and player clicked on it to stop, he must be able to click on it second time to cancel the "stopping" of the module.

Hmm, disagree. Think of this as a skill cool down. If you decide to stop using a skill, then suddenly the tactical situation changes, why should you get your cooldown suddenly removed?

Agree to all these:

3. Make item icons visually smaller in all inventory windows or give us alternative inventory view.
4. For each container give us filter search in it with filter string (like in market).
5. When market window is opened with something entered in filter string and player presses "Market information" [...] market filter string must be cleared.
8. Remove "Assignment completed" popup window Note: there already is a notification, no need to suggest adding one
10. Name of player(agent) near each message in chat/conversation must be the link to his agent profile
12. Double-clicking player in channel list MUST open his agent profile
Remove Squad name setting window when creating a squad, squad invintation confirmation, and also "player joined the squad" notification for joined player.
15. No [...] "Repair robot" [..] for robot or item if it is at full health
16. "Recycle" and "Destroy" in item context menu must be [...] separated from "Sell", "Repair" and "Market information" items.
17. When any container or inventory is focused, Ctrl+A must select all items in it.
18. Robot Equip window must have button "strip ammo
19. When drag'n'dropping items to "Cargo" button in "Equip" window, they must be placed in robot cargo.
20. In game world, weapon module pop-up menu must have "Ammo/charge for all" menu item, which allows to select and reload ammo for all weapons of that type

Would be nice, not a priority:

7. When viewing extensions outside of terminal, their NIC install price and EP cost must be displayed. It is needed for player to be able to plan (in his mind) his extension installation even outside terminal - not guess how some extension WILL cost.

9. Private converstaion chat dialogs must work as unnamed private rooms: there must be list who is in conversation. If someone closes private chat, he must leave that room list for other participants. It is needed to be able directly signal participants when you leaved conversation. Currently if I close private chat, other participants don't know that and if they write something to me, that private chat appears again in opened channel list.

Don't see a need personally, but don't care either way:

6. There must be "All items" category in market, located first in list and selected by default. It is needed for player to be able to just open market window, enter filter string and see all found items - not just robots, as currently.

===================

BALANCE

Agree:

1. There must be no "destroy item" option when outside of terminal, because such an option allows a victim in pvp to instantly destroy all valuable loot before death or just before he is attacked. Currently prohibiting item destroy during combat doesn't help: victim can destroy valuable item when it saw on radar that enemies are approaching.

I would say allow deleting items on alpha, but put more restrictions on it on beta. However, this has already been raised and devs don't really get our point here.

Not sure:

3. Artifacts must not be instanced for player - their spawns must be shared among all players. That way it will be possible to hunt artifact diggers and then dig what they searched for. Or to search for the same artifact together with corpmate (or girl) - that way it will boost social cooperation a bit.

In two minds about this one. I actually like the relaxed pace of artifact scanning and I think it's the ONLY enjoyable PvE option currently available. Also, it's not as if you run around on beta fighting over your own alliance for them. Also consider what a pest it would be on alpha to share your artifacts. Having said that, I think it would be cool to be able to share your artifacts with your squad, plus there are probably things you could do to make artifact spawns a more competitive item...but only if you added something else to replace the type of gameplay it currently offers.

Disagree:

2. If player is logged off and his robot is attacked after that, it must receive X minute aggro timer (10 mins, for example) during which his bot will not disappear and can be destroyed.

No need - you can't log off if you are targeted (however, I'm presuming this works even if you have instant logged instead of being in the middle of safe logging, which I haven't tried).

4. If the source of EW/demobilisation effect died, the effect must instantly disappear. It is needed to give more tactical flexibility to fights.

Cycle times are pretty short, not sure this would add much tactical flexibility. For instance, last night my kain got chased by two or three ewar who were supported by another three kains a klick or so behind them. One of the ewar managed to get a demob on me, but dropped back to avoid being killed when I shot at it, then the demob ran out and I was out of range. Shortly after they again got in demob range but the ewar supporting me demobbed the enemy ewar and I got away a second time.

No, your idea is too complicated. We have separate buttons for primaring and secondaring. If you want to lock targets faster rebind your keyboard or mouse buttons and put primary and secondary buttons closer. Also i advice you to put closer also @switch target@ and @untarget@ buttons.

I vote to put it in "options" window. Can be usefull for EW

Yeah, good idea. I want to see something like windows explorer with sorting, grouping and scaling  capabilities

"Something good can be in it feel i" (Yoda)

You will understand current functionality later. I hope...

No. Market is confidential.

Agree.

Dont want to waste time on "Ballance" section. Simply, play a bit more, then review your proposals.

Why? When you primary someone, they know you've primaried them, because it shows on their UI, and this gives them advance warning that they're about to be fired on. So with your suggestion, if your squad leader tells you to secondary lock several targets, you could end up primarying the next one before he calls it, thus giving it advance warning. I don't want the targeting system automatically to choose a new primary target for me when my current target dies.

It's not obvious. It's more tactical if the player has complete control over what is primary and what is secondary.

I think this is one of the things Perpetuum does better than EVE.

Oh I see what you're saying. Fair enough that makes sense.

I could agree to a system where a corp has access to the trade logs of and outpost that it owns.

So you don't want to cancel the stopping, what you actually want is to be able to click to start it again, and the command is queued, so that it starts again as soon as it's stopped. I wouldn't like this because I think it's too complicated and not something I want to have to keep track of. Your module is either off, on, starting or stopping. If you want to start it again just wait until it's finished stopping.

Confidential markets open more opportunity for .... I think sneakiness is the word.

Adversely, a large corporation could easily grief and destroy any solo marketeer if they could specifically target thier buy/sell orders. Currently, that same corp could manipulate specific ITEMS, but not agents.

At some point in the game, it could make sense to add more information to the market, at this point I think the market has more power being anonymous.

Yes you should. Because your primary target is displayed on that target's screen so it has to occur as a direct result of a button you press.

This is not what you're asking for above. This is already possible.

I think this is nonsense. In fact, quite the opposite - the game attracts people who like more tactical choices in their pvp. There are a lot more reasons why a game succeeds and fails and frankly the state of Perpetuum's current population has got nothing to do with some incredibly minor targeting priority issue.

Targeting issue is just one small problem.

Why my robot stops if it encounters obstactle that is almost parallel to its movement?

Why if newbie takes any lvl1 mission without doing tutorial, he can't complete it because he have less ammo than required for mission completion (and less than mission gives / rewards)?
(Noobships in that cursed spaceship game have infinite ammo for a reason!)

Why if newbie wants to bring to another outpost both his Prometheus and Baphometh, he can't possible do that at all without training for almost a week for sequer (and he must also buy it!) to repackage both robots and move here (and lose insurance)?
(Capsules in that stupid spaceship game exist for a reason too!)

Why if newbie lost everything to npc, all he got is arkhe without any modules? How is he supposed to catch up, if he have no NIC? He must beg for NIC in "General Chat"? Or maybe in "Help"?

Why is it so that it is impossible to effectively farm NPC of any level for loot without training second alt for Sequer? (Because field container can disappear when you go to and back from terminal for sequer on the same character)

Why is it so that doing any mission is so boring because of transportation and is infinitely less profitable than staying in one place and killing constantly spawning mobs?

What is purpose of mob killing, if all what is happening is that mobs respawn almost instantly before newbie kills last mob in spawn? What newbie should feel, when all what he is accomplished in last 10 minutes instantly restores and almost tells him "You are nothing. See, all what you've done is reverted. You haven't destroyed anything".
(Missions in Eve have no respawning NPCs for a reason!)

What is purpose of alpha-islands in PVP-oriented sandboxed game, if you can do literally nothing harmful to other players here: you cannot shoot at them, you cannot take their loot, your cannot trick them into aggroing you, you cannot declare corpwar, you cannot overtrade them (because of market anonymity you will always overtrade "anonymous market" in your eyes). It's like hellokittyonline, but with robots on some biotechno planet.

And still, on the very same alpha-islands if newbie (like it happend to every single one of us) will travel in half-afk in his shining new assault robot to second outpost for lvl2 missions, he almost 100% be killed by small ewar npcs which spawn on most direct route. What must he think? "I can do nothing to other players, but I'm loosing everything to common npcs".

That's why I'm saying that with such an approach to new players Perpetuum's online will remain at 140-170 people. People like me, who played Eve for 3+ years with thousands of kills, and hardcore pvpers in m2s and other corps will endure and adapt, but what's worth in it when there is no fresh blood of carebears to kill or recruits to recruit?

Please understand me. Every one of us felt all these moments of frustration when he started to play Perpetuum (in beta or release). But large part of us just quit, another part (mostly in pvp-oriented beta island corps) took the stance "you just a newb, you must suffer. you don't understand anything". Don't be one of them.