That is, do you think that MMO games should be enough 20 people to successfully attack and destroy the high-end content?

Now we have a group of maximum 20 people. The game is designed not to the general 100. Any online MMO game should keep as many players as they want to play it. This may not be 100 and 10,000. What will happen with the base, if the attack is not 20, and 200? High-end content will be destroyed in a few minutes.

And when you consider that there is no available CPU to build more turrets, the question of the protection is removed.

Chemist,
give it up

Gamma is a concept that is tailored towards *** kind of playstyle, not the average player.
And as far as i can see, it works well. You have 6 Sandbox islands exclusive content for a handfull of zerg-style player,
6 islands to roam to eventually find one of those, if they are logged in at all,

and then you got 6 islands where pvp is prohibited, but gameplay is reduced to a bare minimum for everyone else.

you can compare it with free2play games, where you have to pay money to get the actual content unlocked, just that the DEVs here prefer to not benefit on their own.

that aside,
leave anomalies alone... they are scary!

eh, interesting mechanic, but a turret here and there solve easily

I consider it bad, that anomalies can spawn within 1000m of a Gamma terminal, as this means in worst case the anomaly is direct beneath critical defense buildings allowing enemies to enter the most vulnerable part of your base bypassing the turrets.

At the moment no corp is able to cover their base 24/7 and even if player base rises by 100 I doubt that any corp would be able to be active defending 24/7 over a month. Ofc this means your not loosing the base, if base is 2h unguarded, but in worst case you can encounter critical damage within 2h making it difficult for you to active defend a base afterwards.

A (good) base costs billions in NIC and severe agent hours in gameplay to establish. I would prefer if attacker need to spend similar effort to bring it down without having a mechanic that bypasses the turrets direct.

In some cases even a yagel jumping in core base and getting screenshot of buildings could be sufficient to learn how to attack a base properly. But if Lithus can jump and place bombs to hit one building in reinforcement the damage could be the difference between loose or keep a base.

You've spent this time voluntarily.

You offtopic.

This does not apply to the topic. I do not care what and where you are spending. It is your own business.

You cannot destroy a Gamma base in a few minutes.

You can reinforce it through an anomaly, but there is no guarantee that anomaly will respawn in a convenient location 3 days later. Hell, there's no guarantee the station will come out of reinforce in 3 days like it's supposed to.

You cannot destroy a single ANYTHING that is being repaired by triple repair nodes as long as there is 1(!) defender there to swap connections around.

You're writing out of your *** because you are pretending that buildings don't have a reinforcement timer and anomalies are permanent.

One man sitting for 30 minutes in game can worth more than another 50 nerds sitting all day

Anyway, if you have much more firepower than your enemies, then i think you shouldn't give anomalies too much weight in your equation?

This issue needs to be looked into urgently.
Right now, Gamma base attack is "teleport anomaly online" instead of what it should be.