• EOH
  • Agent
  • Offline

Topic: Geoscanner Accuracy

I noticed today that my scans weren't all going to the same place even at 100% accuracy. Pic is linked and I've omitted a few other directional arrows due to terraforming ect. which also do not point to the correct spot. Was wondering if this is a fluke or Hungarian accuracy at work. I would understand if it was in the 100m range off but 1000m+ is ridiculous.

http://postimage.org/image/cqrfk2p8v/

  • REMEDY
  • Agent
  • Offline

Re: Geoscanner Accuracy

yea have figured that out as well. seams as 100%<100% ^^

  • BKK
  • Agent
  • Offline

Re: Geoscanner Accuracy

hmm, i thought that was fixed when they capped it at 100%, because it was even worse the higher above 100% you got.

*Disclaimer: This post can contain strong sarcasm or cynical remarks. keep that in mind!
Whining - It's amazing how fast your trivial concerns will disappear
  • YBA
  • Agent
  • Offline

Re: Geoscanner Accuracy

Queen Latifah wrote:

I noticed today that my scans weren't all going to the same place even at 100% accuracy. Pic is linked and I've omitted a few other directional arrows due to terraforming ect. which also do not point to the correct spot. Was wondering if this is a fluke or Hungarian accuracy at work. I would understand if it was in the 100m range off but 1000m+ is ridiculous.

http://postimage.org/image/cqrfk2p8v/

Would be really helpful to see a tile scan too. The directional scanner points to the nearest tile so if you move parallel to a 150m or 200m wide field then the directional scans must necessarily point to a different place all along your path.

None of those scans look 1000m off.