But doesn't having open to everyone outposts allow griefing exploits and kinda defeats the purpose of actually owning the outpost? I mean there is already not much of a reason to own the outpost other than prestige. How can making PvP more organized will create much more problems? I mean at this point enemy corp doesn't really need to take outpost away from you, they can just sit in their own and gank you at your own outpost by making it their spawn base. Arkhes are free, you die - you respawn at the same outpost, jump into free arkhe, equip free guns and bullets and continue ganking... I see little logic in this. Me hopes you devs will review this and maybe find it logical to restrict access to owning corp members until the other corp takes that outpost away from you. Kinda makes sense, doesn't it?

We have something in mind for the homebase problem, but we can't restrict direct access to outposts in any way.

Access != home base setting

Access = entering the outpost

They are certainly capable of restricting home base setting depending on corp/relation to the owning corp, but cant keep someone from docking due to the current mission system.

You will surely be able to keep other players entering a structure you have built once we have that system, but closing down outposts for 90% of the playerbase is just not feasible currently.

It's what Neoxx said, it's not that we can't, we don't want to.