Yes, I would suggest that the modules that boosted head slot modules be misc arm slots

IKR, so ill stop seeing mechs running around with no arms looks so silly

Moving EW to misc slots would make some sense. Then you get a nice role distinction between slot types. I.e. heads are scanning and boosting, chassis is targeted stuff, legs are defense/mobility. Something along those lines anyway.

yes please ... it annoys me to no end that a demob is headslot :-)

Then whats the point of having a vagabond with only 3 legslots, 3 chassis, and 5 head if all EW goes to chassis??  Im ok for the EW tuning going to misc, than can make sense, and id like to have "arms" on my vaga too, but lol all EW to chassis really that doesnt make any sense for me.

Headslot number is the determining factor for EW capabilities...  Otherwise a kain (with his 4 misc chassis slots) would be more "EW fittable" than a vagabond (2 misc chassis slots). Lol at this idea...

Oh ok and why not change everything in the game to fit the "superior idea" of messing all the slot type balances for every type of bots/mechs, btw your telling me that, despite the fact ive nearly maxxed all ecm related skills, i would (well i know that will never happen but heh i just feel like to give my pov) in that case be able to fit only 2 of them.... ahah really guys sometimes i wonder...  you gladly ask to change everything in the fitting world so you can fit a demob and have all your head slots?  Clearly its something asked by light/assault pilots that are annoyed to have so few headslots, so they dont have to lose one on demob.  Just try to get some perspective about the fact everyone play the game differently.

Ewar parts should really have to be mounted like weapons IMHO it just makes sense be cause it is a WEAPON after all, if it is only electronic.

This is being asked for by EW / Spec ops pilot. I rarely pilot lights or assaults. it just makes for a good game when you can add tuners for all types of items. ill let the DEV's figure out where they want to fit modules so it works with their plans. I just want to be able to boost my EW skills with tuners because skills only go so far, just as is the case with weapon damage and mining yield. 

They can leave everything as is and make the ew tuners fit in to turret or mics slots IDC. but EW pilots dont have the same boosting capabilities as pure dps pilots which is in a way unbalanced.

  Im 100% ok with you as i said lets have tunings for more modules type, its a good idea and improve diversity.

Thats exactly what im telling, now your idea imply to modify slot numbers and positions for a mech, and if another guy comes up with similar reclamations as me, you ll say: "Ok guys, lets just modify this too!" If your asking for something (feature request right), i assume you already asked yourself if this something would not completely change balance/gameplay in the game, in such a way it would denaturate it completely.

Some dont understand what electronic warfare does mean it seems...  Ictus is specialized in draining/neuting, wich is NOT EW, even if its a EW mech.  Look closer at ingame help, drainer/neutralizer are engineering. Ictus has bonus to it, but in no way it uses EW on chassis.

Your asking me for more imagination, but you seems to have difficulties admitting an EW mech has mostly Engineering bonuses...

And for the ones saying its logical to have EW mods fitted on chassis rather than on headslots, well were not from the same logic then.

  EW only purpose is to disrupt target specific capacities, like speed, sensor range etc...  To do so they send particular energetic signals, but as signal they emmit very low energy. So its logical to think they can be enclosed INSIDE the robot hull.

On the contrary any module type that need an EXTERNAL shape, like weapons, any type of HEAVY energy transfer, gathering modules etc... all those ones can only be fitted on chassis.

At least its how i guess the devs thinked of it, and for me its pure logic.

Well, if we're being pedantic... "Class: Advanced mech specialized in electronic warfare." That's the in-game Ictus description, even though it only has bonuses in neuts, drainers and shields. 2 options: these are EW bonuses or you can't trust the game descriptions. Your conclusion is false or your logic invalid.

Arga gets at an important problem. You can find ways to boost all EW (or "engineering" ) bots equally. But that boosts them relative to everything else.

If EW tuning works like weapon tuning, then EW w/o tuning should be worse than now, with tuning it could be a little better than now. I.e. choose focused effectiveness or versatility. Alternatively, EW tunings could be like scripts in EVE: use them to trade some of one ability for a boost in another. With made up numbers: 2xSS = 20% lock time, 40% range damp; 1xSS+1xTuner = 10% lock time, 50% range damp, 2x acc. drain for the SS.

That last bit is also, IMO, the only real way for the conflict between head-slot tuners and head-slot EW make any sense.

Past this point, we're into theory geek number crunching. Not worth the effort for a "someday maybe" feature.

why not norrdec? a normal assault roam, replacing one weapon with a neut or drainer could kill  erp tank bots with ease.

why should this not work for ecm, demob and supressor too? grofo and mesmer and tyrannos having unused misc slots for that.