thank you for clarifying problem.

I like this quote, it highlights what the other side misses in this whole issue....

the problem is, is that once a side attains the power to take one outpost, since the world is so small, he now can take all the rest.

It's a very simple formula, for a large alliance....
-without sparks -> it's difficult to hold more than 3 or 4 outposts
-with sparks -> it is easy to hold all outposts

All you need is the force to roll one outpost, then it's one-click-teleport, rinse and repeat, now we own all outposts.

I want to highlight this as its the nub of the problem.

This is supposed to be balanced by logistical difficulty. Currently it isn't.

The reason the devs didn't hard code in teleports that instalink everywhere is to give this balance.

So ur saying u will SPT to asintec B insted that way u still whont use sparking to take those ilands?

So are u going to live and base ur entire alliance out of shinj?  or use sparking once again when a sap comes out????

Do u not get my point yet?

Spark advantage comes in to play when YOU guys are active on the iland and trying to do stuff other than comming in whit a hughe blob fleet that sparked in from Asintec B just to take the SAP. 
It also comes in to play when some one at the same time tryes to take a outpost the current dominating blob will just spark there and deffend that to whit out much effort to hold it...

Currently beta mechanics only allows the BIGEST blob to hold them as evry one else said pretty much king off the hill game paly right now............

Do u think 1-2 corps shuld hold all beta outposts? is this good gameplay? sparking is broken to hell.

Its a stupid question and misses the whole point line. With sufficient preperation a bigger force can take anywhere. Sparks reduces the effort making you able to take anywhere.

A better question would be without sparks would you successfully defend five islands? I think the answer is no.

Im sorry but SAPs dont come upp at the same times.......

They have a suposed random 8-16h cool down witch is enught to move a force to the next comming SAP whit sparks.   U can even deffend 2 outpost whit spark even if the sap came out at the same time all u need is detectors and ur fleet sitting in the outpost redy to spark to were ever the hostiles are at.

All u need is 1 outpost to shutdown a entire iland and or conquer it whit sparking.  Evry one has sparks in TMB, ASINTEC B, ICB   Witch has shrunk the world to a penut and kicked the game way out of balance.

Then why are you saying that we are defending ALL the SAPs with SpT? Again, we are defending just one SAP at one time, exactly because of random SAP times.

No we don't, and Domhalarn campaign showed that. Again, we were defending only most important SAP which resulted in you successfully took other one.

And there is another example. If 2 SAPs are up at the same island at the same time, split up. Show a half of your forces on one SAP, distract our fleet good enough, then let the second half complete the other SAP. Even if we split our fleet too, each half of your fleet will need to deal with much lesser forces. Divide et Impera.

Everyone can set SpT on ABT, ICSB and TMB without any restrictions. By your logic, that should mean that they should be able to conquer all the OPs on that island, but that doesn't happens. Why so?

That's not 2 SAPs. That's 1 SAP and 1 SAP. It's not the same.

And still, there is 10 ppl at Sap 1 and the same 10 ppl at SAP 2, noone added due to SpT. If you can't deal with us at Heydelhorn, you will be unable to deal with us at Nauwy. So all you're trying to achieve - is not letting us to get at Nauwy in time, evading a fight completely.

Should anyone really get something without a fight? It's not a Barbie Online, you know.

But there is no such single corp that holds even a single islands. Where do you see that corp? We are an Alliance, and by any means we are acting as an Alliance when it comes to attack, defend and own something.

this is the policy of double faces, how delightful!

It doesn't matter who has the most powerful force to me, it is still broken.

And that's what it comes down to, power just like the title of the thread, and the ability to distribute power across NIA.

When alliances are forced to split their power base, the opposition only has to defeat the power onsite, not the power of the entire alliance.

SpT is broken because it allows the most powerful alliances to move that power around TOO quickly.

Teleporters are not the same as SpT, it takes time for them to power up, there is a delay between uses, and the DESTINATIONS are 100% different than SpT.

The timing of the SAPS isn't relative, the issue is that without SpT, it would be a TOTAL pain in the *** to move an entire fleet from Island1-SAP to Island2-SAP 'just in case' it was going to be attacked. With SpT you don't have to make that investment in mind numbing movement time, you just wait until an attack occurs then SpT in.

That is what is supposed to make HOLDING outposts on multiple islands PIA, the TIME and effort to move troops around.

You're 'Take it if you can' issue is valid, IF you had enough power to occupy the Islands continually; but your using broken mechanics to side-step the 'inconvient' part of holding multiple islands to make up for a lack of power.

That said. It's not up to any player or corp to fix this. If the devs are 'listening' to the community and weighting the opinion of people playing over objective analysis, then they deserve exactly what they are going to get.