Ville wrote:Line wrote:While I'm not protecting anyone who may or may not using that "respawn"bug, I'd like to note here one thing: arkhes can't be produced and have no value, confirmed by your words. Proximity probes, however, do have exact value which is much more than an arkhe for sure, you can't argue that. As a result, killing probe with an arkhe is a great unfair advantage, however, noone was punished for that, despite someone even used an a trial accounts which makes it even worse.
So the question is - why the EULA should work only in a way that suits you? Why arkhe pvpers shouldn't be punished?
Because YOU as a player choose to place Probes in the clear open for anything with a gun to shoot it. If it wasn't an arkhe, it would be an light bot, hell it could be a plated argano. you couln't defend your station from some simple arkhes... tssk tssk.. AIG was defending a station during their prime time against waves of suicide bots running straight to the destruction SAP. A Dhame someone had to do that to them =/
Could be != was. It's YOU as a player choose to use free arkhe instead of any other bot. You KNEW that it's an advantage. You KNEW that it's doesn't seem right and legit to kill sthing for free. And even if it was not you using them, you KNEW that your mates doing that and you did NOTHING, cuz it suits YOU.
Account sharing was used by months and Syndic wasn't care, even stating that it's ok. Surprisingly, when it came to punishment he started to QQ on how cruel this world is and did ragequit. Not a word he broke EULA...ever! But look how care he is when others probably broke EULA! And we should ask ourself - if it will be some allied corp or even his own instead - will he start to ragepost here? OH NO NO NO THIS IS SO RONG! BAN TEH %allied_corp_name%!!11oneone
I hardly believe that. So back to the question - WHY the EULA should work only in a way that suits YOU?
Have a productive day, runner!
R.I.P. Chenoa, you'll never be forgotten.
DEV Zoom: Line, sorry, I was away for christmas.
http://perp-kill.net/?m=view&id=252086