6,401 Reply by Annihilator

(6 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

hmm thats almost a copy&paste of my suggestion in the other topic

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6,402 Reply by Annihilator

(2 replies, posted in Q & A)

i dont get your math.

Go to forum: Q & A

6,403 Reply by Annihilator

(18 replies, posted in Open discussion)

"I didn't want that bot anyway"

Go to forum: Open discussion

6,404 Reply by Annihilator

(4 replies, posted in Q & A)

its called dimishing returns, and prevents for Bonuses that are decreasing something, to turn into negatives or zero.

its not very uncommmon.

Go to forum: Q & A

6,405 Reply by Annihilator

(18 replies, posted in Open discussion)

"Bite my shiny metal ***!"

Go to forum: Open discussion

6,406 Reply by Annihilator

(1 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

heavys only got those two weak points - sensor strenth and... they are expensive.

and check the numbers

small bot = 120 HW³
small ewar = 100 HW ³
Assault = 100 HW³
Mech = 120 HW³
Ewar Mech = 125 HW³
Heavy Mech = 85 HW³

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6,407 Reply by Annihilator

(6 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

wow, what a respectfull and detailed request.

i guess noone ever did something like this!

i disagree

vote for Zoids!

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6,408 Reply by Annihilator

(4 replies, posted in Q & A)

in most cases its x*(1+bonus) for increasing effects, and
x / (1+bonus) for decreasing effects.

in very seldom and special ones its x * (1-bonus)

not a single unlogical rounding bug...

http://forums.perpetuum-online.com/topi … s-x1bonus/

Go to forum: Q & A