1 Reply by Aven Valkyr

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

seriously tho you don't see us getting any handouts.  This is completely unjustified and u know it.

Go to forum: General discussion

2 Topic by Aven Valkyr

(15 replies, posted in General discussion)

Hey I got a majour concern to bring up with the dev's.  We owned them during the intrusion today because of what M2S said was lag.  Let me tell you that our guys had all their graphics settings turned down to 0, and even low res bots were on.  I can't believe that M2S decided to hold an op like this with their graphics turned up and then claimed lag.  The reason I am talking about all this (I could care less otherwise) is that you replace their mech??? WTF IS THAT??? I really hope this is just a rumour but I hear that their artemis was a prototype (don't ask where this info is coming from) and because of that you gave it back to them.  This is total B.S. if it's true.  SORRY GUYS, L2 AND TURN YOUR F*IN GRAPHICS SETTINGS DOWN NEXT TIME.  If the devs really did replace that mech,  I WANT 10 F*IN MECHS IN MY HANGAR, NAAAOOOOOO.  You guys can't just start replacing people's gear because of disconnects.  The #1 reason why I'm angry about this is , because our guys were on the field just the same as M2S and we had  NO DISCONNECTS.  Hmmmmm what could be the problem then.  It obviously wasn't a server issue, we only had like 6 guys out of 100 with lag issues.  So tell me with over half the bots on the field running smooth and M2S's force were running like ***, why would this problem happen.  I think it's because they don't know what sandbox pvp is like, or how to run it.  I spent 15 minutes in TS tellin ppl how to turn down all their crap to avoid exactly this issue.  I am truley disappointed in the devs for this, and please PLEASE tell me i"m pissed right off for nothing.  PLEASE!  And if I AM in the right, then hell,  next time we do a big op like this, our guys are gonna turn their graphics settings up, and get you devs to replace the whole fleet!!!! you want that??? Yeah I think you do.  The thing that gets me the most about this is that M2S was STUPID enough to have a proto on the field, the mech taht is worth 10x your average mech.  Why??? Why would you be that DUMB?  And then to kiss *** and play psychological warefare on the devs to get your *** back???   U know what, I'm tired of your *** talking us in forums, I am tired of your *** talk in general chat, I'm tired of you *** at the devs at how much of a bunch of steamrollers we are, and you know what?? TOOOOOO F*IN BAD!  L2 NOT SUCK.

Go to forum: General discussion

3 Topic by Aven Valkyr

(2 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

OK guys first off thanks for making such a great game.  I'm thoroughly addicted!  I think the game is polished and a lot of effort has gone into it, but there should always be room for improvement!

I have been playing perpetuum for only a couple of weeks and here is my biggest beef with this game:

THE LANDMARKS WINDOW.

Here is how you could/SHOULD improve it:
1)  Allow the columns to be repositioned.  Putting the Angle column at the end of all the other columns is kindof useless, since the first info I want to look at is not only how far they are, but WHERE they are as well.  Allowing the user to control which columns appear where would be great!
2) Proper sorting / sorting filters:  It would be nice to be able to sort what I have in my landmarks windows in certain ways.  Give each column a good worked out sort function, with a couple sorting filters such as: 
  a)RELATIONSHIP (friendly, neutral, hostile, corp etc..)
  b)ICON (bot type), small bots first, then assaults, then mech, heavy mech, all other landmarks
  c)DAMAGE (heaviest -> least damaged)
3) Overall filters need to be improved.  It would be nice to show only hostile bots in the landmarks window, or for logistic pilots the opposite (only squad/corp guys in the window).  I think the landmark window needs extra check boxes under the Relations filter options called Corp, Alliance, Squad.  So deselecting any of those 3 will remove those players from your landmark window or show them.  You get the idea
4) Ability to remove any colums from the window.
5) Hate to bring EVE into this but, the ability to save overview settings and open 2 - 3 different overview and have them in tabs in the landmark window.  Then if a player is mining and all of a sudden ends up in PVP, a simple click of a tab will open the proper columns/sorting functions for a pilot.

Thanks for hearing me out and I'm sure I will have more suggestions for you later!  o7

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

4 Reply by Aven Valkyr

(26 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

or you can make it easier.  Just give the landmarks window the ability to not only filter agents by relation status, but also if they are in your corp/alliance/squad.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

5 Reply by Aven Valkyr

(8 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

I disagree.  Don't just make the icons bigger, I like the radar as it is.  What you should do instead is give people the *option* to make the icons bigger, that way the people who like them small can keep them that way.

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

6 Topic by Aven Valkyr

(2 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

It would be nice if I could separate my corp and my general discussions window so that when my chat window blinks I know whether to ignore it or respond to it.  Thanks

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests

7 Topic by Aven Valkyr

(16 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

deploying from the terminal should have a "cancel" button.  Sometimes I realize I needed to put something in my hold and then I have to wait 45 seconds to get back into the terminal.  Thanks

Go to forum: Feature discussion and requests