51

(19 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

to be honest this game was more enjoyable before Gamma

Stop *** around with new features or even the god damn Steam modifications, Till you FIX the LAG issue with the server and client..Maybe turn off all those structure animations because no one gives a *** if they sparkle...I know it's not my computer my cpu is only at 65% utilized and my GPU around 45% but hit I have to mash the *** out of my keyboard to get my guns to fire and loots...most can decay just not enough time to loot.

SO FIX THE *** SYNC ISSUES BETWEEN THE CLIENT AND THE SERVER!!!!!!!!

53

(9 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Syndic wrote:

~20 day buddy keys subscribed accounts can use to invite brosefs to the game, if the brosefs sub then the account who invited them gets rewarded with either 30 days to sub-time or an ICE (their choice). Only works for brand new accounts.

I'm suprised you haven't ripped this off from EVE a long time ago, it's a great way to motivate existing players to get more players.

I would say 15 days instead of 20 and the new account would need to sub up before the buddy gets the reward.

+1 reward people that bring more players to the game.

thats been kind of the way it always was, out of 10 people recruited only maybe 3 would want to pvp actively. some would pvp that normally don't like to when wanting to protect there base but thats about it. So I don't see this ratio changing much even with steam release, just the nature of peoples play style that is in question. Plus you just don't know what your going to get anyway so there is no reason to speculate.

55

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Arga wrote:

"Main effect" does not mean "massive effect".

As I've restated numerous times in this thread, run some though experiments yourself to see where the change will impact.

In the short term, with so few players, I doubt the change will really have much of any change to STC/NEBS. Other than maybe having to mine on (2) Islands to bounce the ores back and forth, but even then it would probably just be colixum... but that's just best guess since I have no idea who, how, or where anyone is currently mining.



This is exactly the wrong reason to make a change.

I would rather like to be able to recycle commodities back to it's raw materials.

57

(16 replies, posted in General discussion)

keep reaching aye pod....you guys failed to do this with Merkle...you can only cry wolf so many times to the devs.

Either way good luck

58

(16 replies, posted in General discussion)

Syndic wrote:

Xad can you elaborate on how you got scammed out of 100$ for a Perp account?

P.S.

Selling bridge cheap, PM offer

simply because it's not true.

did Skynet 2.0 even happen?

60

(16 replies, posted in General discussion)

Zoom can you elaborate on what they are talking about with this reset they appear to be waiting for ?


Should Alert the CDC it appears an outbreak of "bitter vet syndrome" is occurring.

I see it under industrial implements on the market.

http://clip2net.com/s/5fvvUW

62

(4 replies, posted in Bugs)

um..wow ok then...good luck.

63

(16 replies, posted in General discussion)

Oh happy day.

64

(4 replies, posted in Bugs)

in the image you supplied you circled two npc with completely different names. The mission are very specific, if it is asking for "Patrician Gallowglass" you need to kill it, because killing a "Patrician Legionary" will not meet the requirement of the mission for a "patrician Gallowglass". Also the mission states you have to reach position "b" to kill those "Patrician Gallowglass" which is indicated on your map, so for example killing this npc at position "H" will not count towards the mission because it specificly said to kill them at position "b"

I hope this helps.

65

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Lemon wrote:
Merkle wrote:

Lets just restate this again...the unlimited fields you speak of, are on beta and alpha as well...


Just dont complain when heavy's triple in price and the mods to fit them do just the same.

Its laughable to compare mining to m2s right clicking and insta 100 heavy mechs.

Been giving you far to much credit this whole time apparently.

I dont care about limited or unlimted fields, my point has to do with the stock-piles and the EP difference between us and new players. I am stating that the game cannot handle the population needed to offset the advantages we have over them. In order for them to even have a fighting chance.

In the event that a population rise does happen and it is not at the proper level they will have the same experiences and results as many of the corps in our past have. They will face enemy's who appear to be unbeatable and never ending assets. Being low on EP and lack of experience there ability to combat the vets will be almost not existent. It will be like running on beta 4x4 box on beta with a arkhe with no guns, except they

We had to face a group at launch that only had 2-4 months EP advantage on us with resources and knowledge. You know what that perception did for the moral of the players during that time.

Do you see what I am getting at or should I finger paint it for you guys? limited or unlimted resource, If they arn't worth gathering then it wont matter which they are.

Like STC for example.

66

(2 replies, posted in Bugs)

Can't even kill a scarab with one.

I set off three individual plasma bomb to kill a indy spawn and failed to kill them all.

can't change the probe name or add people to the probe list.

68

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

in the begining it was easy to get the rare minerals in eve because they were all in lowsec like a .03 systems. it wasn't for almost a year before they created 0.0 system and moved the rares there.

I also wish people would stop comparing this game to eve, Eve had more funding and devs from the begining and this is a completely different game with different balancing concerns and issue

69

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Lemon wrote:
Tux wrote:

I agree .. the current system works well

Dont change anything ... PLEASE !!!

If players want pvp they know where to go for it ... its not like people dont know where others live ....

what this whole thing is about is people wanting lazy pvp, theres no reason to up end the resource system so a few people can go gank miners again.

+1 Martha

Why can't I go out for a Hour or maybe 2 and get a decent challenging PvP fight on this Wednesday evening?


Because you need to login more in one Wednesday in 2 month otherwise people will cry the game is dead and leave.

70

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

or but the arena island back in and make a random pvp queue instance based for small battles.. etc..

71

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Bad...Idea

I look at it like this!!

Indy promotos pvp through gather resource and building mods and bots, and not the cause for pvp.

You need people out there with a reason for combat roams or missions etc..

If you do indeed do this then I will require you do it with all island include alpha.

Think of a different driver for pvp, and not use the poor indy bot ganking to be the pvp.

72

(153 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

before we argue points to redesign the game, I think we should wait and allow the dev's to run there course of the coming changes.

73

(25 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

Ville wrote:

This has been like this since bergers was built, the whole purpose for ewar so close to a wall is to prevent from terraforming in.  I have A whole section of 90 turrets like this.

Edited: clarification of day my day one.


Thais truly makes me happy ville

that issue was based on your personal relation not your corps.

75

(8 replies, posted in Balancing)

I would agree in regards to trial account being denied getting on gamma.

FYI - EWAR turret already have a priority list of targets, they target EWAR, then support, then combat.