Title pretty much says it all.

27

(7 replies, posted in Open discussion)

No bump needed...

Don't know why you're talkin ***, just wanted to share what I thought was a hell of a deal that also helps charity.

28

(14 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Ville wrote:

Yo, Devs, Let's kick it!

We want that Ice Ice Baby, Ice Ice Baby
All right  Stop, Collaborate and Listen
Ville's back with a brand new invention
Demob grabs a hold of me tightly
Flow like a UDC Slug daily and nightly
Will it ever stop?  No.
Turn off the lights and that monitor glow
To the extreme I rock a Mesmer MK2 like a vandal
Light up an Island and wax a castel like a candle.

We want that ICE ICE BABY!  2400 Perpetuum Credits Maybe?
We want that ICE ICE Baby!


Your attempts at vanilla ice impressions are grossly underwhelming.

And Ice is hardly a new invention.

29

(49 replies, posted in General discussion)

Luke Broker wrote:

I find it funny that the people with the most power in the game in terms of money and assets, are the ones that started this topic. while the people who dont have that much money and assets yet with more active people, are able to topple some of the stations.

the way I see it. the mechanics are working.


Good on you guys, keep it up keep hitting stations and make them leave archeage to log in and defend yarr

Btw, a good tactic that gets their goat every single time.... as soon as you see them actually coming to defend/attack... dock up and blueball them. They'll be frothing at the mouth like the rabid dogs they are lol

30

(62 replies, posted in Balancing)

Rex Amelius wrote:
Smokeyii wrote:
Gwyndor wrote:

You're right, excluding people was.

We tried to talk to you about spies, and ya'll didn't want to listen... and there were only like 2 ops you weren't invited on. Every other time we invited you, you showed up late, in the wrong bots, and there were 20,000 "Where are we going?" questions even though we plainly stated where and when to be somewhere, you couldnt manage to get even a couple guys in position ahead of time.

Sounds like real leadership. I hear its also effective to tell your corpies and allies how much they suck and how all YOUR failures are their fault.


I have no idea where you're going with that statement. To whom are you referring when you say "your", and you might want to double check what you "hear" next time, syndic is a known liar.... wouldn't be surprised at all if you "heard" something completely false from him.

31

(64 replies, posted in General discussion)

Perpetuum wrote:

This isn't about stations, or saps or anything to do with them.

Its about sparks.  Go to Villes thread to discuss those issues there.  Zoom please clean up this thread of OT stuff..

New thoughts over reading several slanders toward the game were playing.

Commit sparks to having a cooldown based upon the distance of spark. 
Example.

You spark, as the bird flies, 1km.  Your cooldown is 1.6 minutes until you can jump again. 
1 Meter = 0.1 second of cooldown.  It will compartmentalize SOME jumping and still allow grouping of power blocks, but distance jumping is offset by a waiting game.


I like this idea a lot, and it's the same idea being discussed in "that other game" with regards to making the world a little smaller. It also encourages corps to hold a logical train, i.e main alpha ->main beta -> gamma, you would want them as close as possible.

IMHO, this idea strikes gold.

32

(62 replies, posted in Balancing)

Gwyndor wrote:

You're right, excluding people was.

We tried to talk to you about spies, and ya'll didn't want to listen... and there were only like 2 ops you weren't invited on. Every other time we invited you, you showed up late, in the wrong bots, and there were 20,000 "Where are we going?" questions even though we plainly stated where and when to be somewhere, you couldnt manage to get even a couple guys in position ahead of time.


But lets be fair, syndic offered you a station if you left and you took him up on it, so don't go blaming anyone else.

33

(49 replies, posted in General discussion)

Khader Khan wrote:
Burial wrote:

Not hard to protect an outpost from 1 assault.

Says the guy with no outposts... Says the guy who thinks 'waiting' is an effective strategy when the enemy shows up with a 'blob'.  One guy in an assault in the off timezone is all it takes to bring a station down up to 20 pts.

I know people don't like that the game unintentionally copies EVE mechanics but we really need to look at their ownership mechanics (which aren't perfect by a long shot). There should be 3 locations around a base (Saps) all should be destro with 3-5 x the current hp and more resists than current. When all 3 are destroyed the Real Sap goes live with in 12- 24 hours if taken the Outpost is put in to Contested (0%) its open to all.

Now we would need another mechanic for deciding who wins the OP like a very large Passive hack that counts per corp not per agent, Corp A has 3 agents in masked lights skirting Corp B 5 agents in Heavies. Of course 5 is more than 3 but the Sap will stay contested until only Corp A or B is the only corp in the Passive area for 2-3 hours. Timer pauses when other corp enters control area.

Once control is established the 3 Destro control points go live and process can be repeated.
Destro points should have a passive repair mechanic.
Destro points should produce a Gamma style alarm.

Now comes the problem of Sap loot. and old saps
Only agents from the owning corp gets access to a set of extra daily missions. Only the CEO gets a mission that would be difficult to complete alone but one that would drop up to a current full active hack drop. Other missions would include harvesting noralgis for PLs and mining epi for PLs, Combat missions with PVP ammo rewards.

Maybe Ville can put in some ideas on productions since I'm just a go getter when it comes to production.

Edit. Only 2 Beta stations can be held by one corp.


You know how many times you guys have thrown it in everyone's face that if you can't defend it you don't deserve it? Now you're saying that 1 guys shouldn't be able to take a sap in someone's "off time?" Give me a *** break. I'm gonna do it.... Yep, here it comes!!!!

If you can't even muster enough to defend against ONE *** ASSAULT, then maybe you don't deserve to hold that station.

Oh, no he didn't! Yes, I did, just use your argument against you.

Even if it's you guys attacking someone else's sap the exact same thing could be said. Again, the problem isn't with the mechanics, it's with the players, both the lack there-of and the blindly allying up because they're (to use sindics term) risk-adverse.

34

(64 replies, posted in General discussion)

Jasmoba wrote:

Cooldowns are terrible.  I prefer fewer sparks than 1 hr CD.   Just imagine if you forgot something and can't go back lol


Well, the answer to that is - Don't *** forget anything. Besides, what's there to forget? It's not like you're taking anything with you when you spark anyways. There should be some sort of commitment from the player for the privilege of using fast travel. I certainly don't think requiring you, the player, to make sure you've done everything you need to do before you spark is too much to ask.

35

(49 replies, posted in General discussion)

Yet another PHM/CIR "We want moar content" thread, when you could have all the content you desire so simply.

It's not even about should 1 person be able to take a sap, but the fact that there's so few people in the game that 1 person can take a sap when there's no-one to defend.

36

(64 replies, posted in General discussion)

I'm +1 on the cooldown idea, always have been. It's the next best thing to an undock timer after sparking that I suggested nearly a year ago, that the devs said no about because they don't want you to have to sit somewhere and wait.

Untz wrote:

@Gwyndor: You don't have to be a supercomputer to figure out, if the urn has 20 balls in it, then the average number of black balls is 10. If a similar mean-reverting random walk has upper and lower bounds 40 nic and 50 nic, then on average the price would be 45 nic. It doesn't need to change particularly fast to add texture to the market - roughly hourly or daily would be fine - but transaction fees would make high-frequency trading unprofitable anyway (that's what regulators in the real world recommend to curb HFT).

@Jita: is there a major source of nic other than plasma? Don't you need nic to pay prototyping and manufacturing fees?


Prototyping and manufacturing fees are really a drop in the bucket and can be more than recouped by the sale of one item out of a run of 50 or more.

Who knows what their intention might have been, but it's all relative to be honest. Are you in a max skilled heavy mk2 combat with a heavy mk2 remote repair robot, or in a light bot with starting and t1 gear? Are you killing npcs at a spawn, or doing beacons?


Just to give you an example, JOKE corp a few months ago with 6 mk2 heavy combats and 6 remote reps with nexus support were doing about a million (edit* I think it was 100k not a million) plasma an hour on Hershfield at a place that had 3 spawns and we were also running 3 beacons at a time.

You'd have to ask cir/77 how many millions per hour they were getting with the plasma bomb daisy chain on beta, but they nerfed explosion damage from npcs to other npcs causes them to drop no loot.

He's not asking how to make nic, he asked "Where does the nic come from" The main source before was mission payout, although there were some npc buy orders in the beginning. Now we also have the npc plasma buy orders generating nic as well.

And yes, Plasma is by far the best way to generate pure nic.


Another fact for you, NPC buy orders are higher on beta for plasma.

I would really hate to be the devs of this game. It's like "We want to be able to jump to other stations!" So they put it in, then people are like "Sparks are OP, take them out!"

Pretty much every change we *** about on the forums is one that the community requested at some point, and we want them to take it out again.

41

(7 replies, posted in Open discussion)

https://www.humblebundle.com/?gallery&a … -106944713

Some really good titles in there for CHEAP. Darksiders II alone would cost $30 from Steam and you can get it for $10 plus all the other games. Titan Quest is great Diablo II style hack n slash rpg, Sup Com.... don't even know about the other games, but those 3 alone worth the $10 many times over.

Ville wrote:
Smokeyii wrote:

They act like we haven't been on the same TS and heard all the bullshit from them. Blows my mind vile thinking he's better than ANYONE in this game. And don't get me wrong, I know I can be an ***, and I've said some *** to people in this game that I would probably take back had I the opportunity, but you won't see me calling people out for *** they've said unless it's something like "I want to see this game burn to the ground", like I've heard before.


The difference between Jita and the one you follow is I've never heard that from Jita.

I think you don't understand, people change.  Things happen.  People change in Real Life because of different reasons.  I have changed.  I'm sorry if you being stuck in the past hurts your imagine of me, but honestly it wouldn't matter.  You and your CEO need someone to hate.  I'm just glad you choice it to be us.


It's funny, we've had the exact same conversation in JOKE about your entire corp and cir.  Ya'll couldn't just have friendly fights, you made up reasons to hate jita and JOKE and set about posting crap on the forums since day 1. All Jita and I have done is respond in kind to you and yours. Besides you, danger stranger and sinny, I don't even dislike any of the rest of you. If anything I pity you for your wayward thinking -- i.e not seeing the forest for the trees, you follow blindly someone who's main goal is the ruination of the game that we all love.


BTW, where's this change you speak of? Did it happen last night, or sometime this morning, like just before you typed out your post?

Shadowmine wrote:

I guess I just never got that argument. If you see someone drop an armored, why didn't you just drop one of your own as soon as you see them drop it? Then you just follow them if they jump... Really not that hard of a concept...


Probably because if you're by yourself you've got like a 1 in 5 (or more on some islands) of actually picking the same teleport they jumped too unless you have probes and such, and if they hit an alpha portal, it's cya later even if you do pick the right teleport.

And if you're not by yourself you'll have to split your forces to jump after him/them.

They act like we haven't been on the same TS and heard all the bullshit from them. Blows my mind vile thinking he's better than ANYONE in this game. And don't get me wrong, I know I can be an ***, and I've said some *** to people in this game that I would probably take back had I the opportunity, but you won't see me calling people out for *** they've said unless it's something like "I want to see this game burn to the ground", like I've heard before.


The difference between Jita and the one you follow is I've never heard that from Jita.

Ville wrote:

I've been saying that since, forever.  God forbid you disagree with Jita,because you will get barraged by personal attack after personal attack.  To the point where you don't even want to post.  Which is EXACTLY what he wants because then there's no one to disagree with him and his circle of cronies can be made to seem like the "majority of the community". And what baffles me is how little consequences are given by the moderator.


Well, I'll be good-god-damned if it ain't the kettle calling the pot black! You, gunner and danger stranger started all this ***. Troll post after troll post since day one reset.

Thread delivers!

47

(26 replies, posted in General discussion)

Later Gremrod. Hope you find another game that suits you.

Syndic wrote:

You mistake anger for indifference.

You are collectively here on the forums demanding DEV intervention and squealing like piglets at every turn for our people to stop teasing you whenever you lose. You protest that we're allied to another corp while having everyone else on the server backing you up. You complain that we use jabber/X/Y to form fleets. In short, you're b*tching because we are not playing the game the way you want us to play.

We will not reset our friends. We will use jabber/X/Y. We will not lower ourselves to your pathetic level of playing the game. You can either get on our level and fight us, or go play something more suited to your capacity, or keep bleating on the forums for Zoom to fight for you.

We will not accommodate you, we will not change anything. If you can't handle that, that's your problem.



All I read in that was "I'm afraid 77th would wtfpwn me and then I'd be a trash corp just like everyone I make fun of."

Change, don't change, whatever. I'll continue to point out your hypocrisy every time you or someone allied to you asks for ~content~ when you could be making your own in the ~sandbox~


You know what I really like though, is you're the only one affirming that you'll not reset. I wonder if maybe some in 77th don't agree with me.

Stradivar wrote:
Smokeyii wrote:

I'll flat out say it, the game would be 1000x better off if cir/phm wasn't playing. Hands down, if you guys disappeared tomorrow, my shrunken Perpetuums might actually grow again.

Guys. YOU NEED BALLS OF STEEL TO WIN PERP!

For 6 months you've been losing bots at a rate of 10 - 1, maybe worse?

4 years in Perp is a long time. No reason now why PoE won't be here in another 4 years.

In that time, somebody will rise to the challenge.

Your puny rag-tag ensemble of has-beens and forum PVPers suck at doing Perp, as displayed once again at South *** last Saturday. Losing to weekend warriors like me.

Perhaps if YOU and your ilk leave perp it would be 1000x better when the server and forum is free from whiny babies, pathetic attempts to win via obvious manipulation of opinions, BS propaganda, trolling and attempts to influence developmental directions. You simply do not need to use such methods.

Tl;dr
Just play the game, play to the best of your ability and enjoy your wins or 10-1 losses with zero access to end-game.

Or gtfo.

Have a nice day, Roboteers...


Yeah you're right the game is better without us... have fun in archeage like the rest of us.

50

(62 replies, posted in Open discussion)

Stranger Danger wrote:
Ville wrote:
Smokeyii wrote:

thanks

Your welcome.


LOL look at smokey run!


Choosing not to play on the same server in Archeage as you slubberdegullions is running?