76

(100 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Really?  Are all you STC/Bkbne players too scared to post on your mains, lol just lol.  Please don't think we are worthless trolls!!! NO!!! My EFeelings might get hurt,
***Canthra Leaves the Channel.

Lol just lol!

77

(34 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

+1 for griefing alpha symbionts.

78

(100 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

Whoa buddy chill with the rage posts.  I understand once again I've closed the loop on STC exploits but is nerd raging out really nessecary?

I'm here till server shuts down.

80

(5 replies, posted in Localization)

I was thinking of doing a players guide to PBS but I figured only 20 real people would read it.

81

(100 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

It's called an IPhone Martha.  Maybe your still rocking the Nokia but I ain't hatin got to start some where.

82

(100 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/284529

83

(100 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

It must be nice to live in you parents basement.  Unfair advantage with the API to the owners of said website.

It's not.  Well played Zoom.  Well played.

+1

Zoom mind cleaning up the corp dialogue stuff?

I like Gamma +1 for gamma.

Yay!  STC now actually HAS to fight!  YAY!

Zortarg I disagree, Jitas base design is simplistic enough to be cost effective and be defended, my base however is mass turret spam hmm

A 2k ring of death coupled with actually powering it is a cluster *** waiting to happen.

90

(15 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

About 225 to 240.

91

(4 replies, posted in Feature discussion and requests)

I sell terminals for 50 mill blocks included. GG

92

(15 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

DEV Zoom wrote:

Noone said it's going to be changed, the bug is apparently a wrong error message.

+1! <3

93

(15 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

I mean it's fine now, just the error message being change would be nice.

Cassius wrote:
Crusader wrote:

Please inform me who else did the terraforming and structure building on bergers?  I can point to 7 individuals and they all have PHM tags on.  Or are you trying to troll?

No troll. I'm giving you full credit for Bergers in the paragraph above. My "one" v entire alliance refers to your PvP, I dont remember the last time we fought a PHM only fleet. If ever. You roll fleets with allies, we do too. Lately, you have more allies in engagements than we do, so you (r side) is winning more. The comedy is in you claiming to be one corp only.

Edit: Your defensive terraforming was 2/3rds completed when CIR set up. Didn't mean PHM only did 2/3rds of all the terraforming, if this is what you were asking.

? do you not understand what the concepts of an alliance is?  Or are you and Nebs not friendly with each other outside of perpetuum and you only tolerate one another to exist in this game?  I'm slightly confused, since my members along with myself and CIR members both play other games together in either the same corp or allied corps together in multiple other games.  Hell it's like we are E Friends, that met on E Harmony. smile  See how I tied that all in together.

When I say 1 Corperation I am refering to the terraforming and defensive structures only.  My Alliance is who you will face in PVP, why because thats how we roll  cool

Annihilator wrote:
Crusader wrote:

Please inform me who else did the terraforming and structure building on bergers?  I can point to 7 individuals and they all have PHM tags on.  Or are you trying to troll?

jita?

heh lol, ok, alright if we are going with it lol

96

(15 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

Well they been screwed up since Gamma Launch fyi if the range was suppossed to be 1K Meters

Please inform me who else did the terraforming and structure building on bergers?  I can point to 7 individuals and they all have PHM tags on.  Or are you trying to troll?

98

(15 replies, posted in Resolved bugs and features)

When using a terraforming beacon, if you drop it too close to something an error message of "within 1000 M of something" this value is wrong it should be 225 meters.

Xadhoom wrote:
DEV Zoom wrote:

So, lately there have been one or two events where one corporation has placed a gamma terminal very close to another corporation's one. Some of you thought, and even I remembered vaguely that there would be a rule which would prevent this.

However, now that we checked the code, there is no such mechanic. There is actually an error message for it, but it's unused. Which means that we planned it at one point, but we either abandoned the idea or simply forgot about it.

Either way, my question here is: is such a rule needed?

If you want my personal opinion, we already have too many of these made-up rules in a supposedly open sandbox, and if you can't defend your base from a newly placed terminal next to it (or preventing it from being built even), maybe you're not supposed to be there after all. It's harsh, but gamma is like that.

But if the majority of you think an artificial restriction like that would make the game more fun, by all means we'll put it in.

the problem with that thought process is if you haven't already built it then it will never get built, because it only take the team with the most fielded player will kill it with Easy.

This kind of thought process will kill your Greenlite attempt.

I don't think this is accurate.  A lot of gamma has to do with diplomacy.  For the sake of epeen if your mouth writes checks your corps *** cash can't cash then your probably going to get wtfpwned.  Honestly why do you think I smack talk your corp so much?  To get emotions stirred to get a fight.  Nothing personal, it's just a way to create pvp in game.

Burial wrote:

Few billion? No wonder your island sucks. lol

1 corp versus an entire alliance.