Ville wrote:Line wrote:Ville wrote:Doesn't matter to me line, I just want my building back and those who were clearly using this as an advantage be discplined.
And here we go, you just want your buildings back and that's it. But hey, what does EULA to do here? There is no word that you should get reimbursement of things you can't protect so maybe you stop QQ here and go build a defence system?
Summing up Lines Posts: Discredit the attacker, post his logic and reasoning, counter attacks the other party by attempting to bring down others, realise he's wrong, insults other party.
Your text book. I'm done with trolling. This is a serious matter and it shouldn't be swept under the rug as a good ol time for all. I believe STC had full knowledge pre engagement what would happen if they went out pvping. Just because they fell short of their goal doesnt mean anyone should feep sorry for them. An exploit is an exploit.
A pre engagement knowledge of a bug that MAY or MAY NOT be applied, whoa! What a deadly knowledge! What a great advantage!
Based on my own experience of that bug, I'm sure some of the CIR bots were immortal on those fights. I also believe that such experienced players prolly knew about that bug pre engagement and were'nt risking any bot. No matter they didn't died - they were ABLE to respawn. That automatically makes them and everyone else a known potential exploiters.
One and only fair solution that can be applied here - is to reimburse EVERY losses on that period for EVERYONE, that will suits all of us for sure.
Have a productive day, runner!
R.I.P. Chenoa, you'll never be forgotten.
DEV Zoom: Line, sorry, I was away for christmas.
http://perp-kill.net/?m=view&id=252086