Re: Hungary to english 99% scan
If the accuracy is going to randomly be 50% worse then it is misleading to even have seconds on the scan. I thought that it would just cap near 100% or approach a limit that isn't quite 100%.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
If the accuracy is going to randomly be 50% worse then it is misleading to even have seconds on the scan. I thought that it would just cap near 100% or approach a limit that isn't quite 100%.
can you back up your assumptions with all numbers necessary to reproduce it?
just saying "i expected 10minutes and got 15" does not help in any way.
Ah there is reason to belief it's my bookkeeping error as a very likely possibility. Scan made at 11:44:00 with 96.25% showed 16:34:52. I was on the passive SAP as it opened and then suprised cehcked the numbers 16 minutes to go. You can check that the Nauwy passive SAP was completed at 16:26:25, 8 minutes before the scan time and that doesn't include time taken to complete it. However it seems taht the 11:44:00 is on the dot and thus likely not written right when it happened. There is a clear possibility that SAP was as early as it could have been at exactly -10 minutes (with 2 minutes of completetion time).
While I was hasty the process of getting corrected shows how using signifcant numbers as a guide to accuracy salvages a lot.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
Generated in 0.071 seconds (90% PHP - 10% DB) with 17 queries