Topic: What we think of the Patch
http://i.imgur.com/Kvxq8A7.jpg
http://www.perp-kill.net/kill/239407
Dev Zoom: I think its time to confess, Ville is my alt
Dev Zoom: Ville can be sometimes so sane it's scary.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
http://i.imgur.com/Kvxq8A7.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Qx4UfDH.png
http://i.imgur.com/e8d0eAp.png
I like the new patch
Mining seth's Are ther best... Fully support this ...
+1
Ville maybe youre just Vile, but I dont get it.
I guess it's time to get the crayons out.
When you lower specific robot bonuses to normalize everyone on the same playing field, the optimization shifts to: maximum amount of head or leg slots.
The Ictus for example, has 3 neut slots, since the bonus was taken down from 8%(80) to 3%(30). Meanwhile on a Seth you get 4 neut slots and more addition leg slots and head slots.
A) your more cap stable in a Seth due to leg slot
B) range is longer
C) you have an additional neut
D) the Ictus got directly screwed by all the trees now, thanks to LOS.
So all these 1.4 million EP Ictus mk2 are being out played by a 750k Seth pilot. And for end game players it's a stab in the back by the developers.
@Ville: I think they left out boosting tuners and adding a stacking penalty as it should always have been. That way the optimization does not shift to # of head or leg slots.
A) your more cap stable in a Seth due to leg slot
Heavy mech has more accumulator than a mech.
B) range is longer
That's a complete lie.
C) you have an additional neut
Ictus has bonus for neuting.
D) the Ictus got directly screwed by all the trees now, thanks to LOS.
It's not just plants put landscape and structures. In any case, DPS has same LOS issues.
Stop trying to shift the meta to Ictus Online. Ictus has countless benefits over Seth. Use the tool that gets the job done.
In the current metagame, if the Devs touch EW even by the slightest percentage it will herald the arrival of the Ictus FOTM.
My problem with stacking tunings is the fights turn into close range battle royales. This is not were perpetuum shines. Perpetuum pvp shines at those 700M+ Battles were it's not about the numbers it's about Terrain and FCs and ewars ability to mitigate the incoming damage.
That's the fights that are epic! But two things totally ruined that.
Trees Online
Follow bot nerf
Stacking penaltys would only further put a nail in the coffin.
Ville doesn't get the difference, because he doesn't need to care about assets that he has been building for years now.
He is the typical "endgame" player that complains about no "engame content" in a game that was about the progress that he skipped with exploiting holes in game logic while they existed.
My problem with stacking tunings is the fights turn into close range battle royales. This is not were perpetuum shines. Perpetuum pvp shines at those 700M+ Battles were it's not about the numbers it's about Terrain and FCs and ewars ability to mitigate the incoming damage.
That's the fights that are epic! But two things totally ruined that.
Trees Online
Follow bot nerf
Stacking penaltys would only further put a nail in the coffin.
On stacking penalties I disagree, longer range fight would be more common due the empty slots left out for ranged fits. There would be more fitting possibilities too, 1 or 2 tuners would be enough buff the 3 tuner would be really dumb to fit.
@Burial prove me wrong. Or are you just that bitter?
@celebro I assume that stacking penalty will be applied to range extenders too? W/o a follow bot there's hardly any Cush in regards to locking range. Explosion damage can be felt upto 200M away in some cases.
Ville doesn't get the difference, because he doesn't need to care about assets that he has been building for years now.
He is the typical "endgame" player that complains about no "engame content" in a game that was about the progress that he skipped with exploiting holes in game logic while they existed.
Anni- The devs were complacent and never patched the holes in time, even though most players and Devs knew about: Turtle islands, Beacon farming on gamma ..etc...
@celebro I assume that stacking penalty will be applied to range extenders too? W/o a follow bot there's hardly any Cush in regards to locking range. Explosion damage can be felt upto 200M away in some cases.
I would assume they could start with tunings first (yellow mods) only. Or give range extenders an extra boost more than tunnings same with SA and rechargers. Anyhow the need for support bot would be less important too once you have a capable fit long range.
@Burial prove me wrong. Or are you just that bitter?
I assume you are talking about the range.
Ictus MK2 max range: 938m
Seth MK2 max range: 827m
Like patch
Ville wrote:@Burial prove me wrong. Or are you just that bitter?
I assume you are talking about the range.
Ictus MK2 max range: 938m
Seth MK2 max range: 827m
Single amp, dual amp or RSAs?
What's the range.
Also have you looked at the differences between 4 neuts against 3 neuts, given the extra head and leg slots?
Annihilator wrote:Ville doesn't get the difference, because he doesn't need to care about assets that he has been building for years now.
He is the typical "endgame" player that complains about no "engame content" in a game that was about the progress that he skipped with exploiting holes in game logic while they existed.Anni- The devs were complacent and never patched the holes in time, even though most players and Devs knew about: Turtle islands, Beacon farming on gamma ..etc...
+1 ... The 9 month gap between announced assignment changes and sparks allowed for massive token farming
The 3 month gap for Epri move to Beta only allowed for myself to personally mine 500 mil Epri on gamma.
To be fair, at the time others "weren't playing" allowing us our Beta station control and unmolested turtle islands. But the point is the gap between announcement and implementation is far too long generally and allows for exploitation for those in position. A 2 week window on changes would be better AFTER whatever change has been fully tested.
Ville wrote:@Burial prove me wrong. Or are you just that bitter?
I assume you are talking about the range.
Ictus MK2 max range: 938m
Seth MK2 max range: 827m
Ictus MK2 Max Range (requires RSA) because the lock range is 450 M. I like how he unbiasedly compared things here, lol
http://i.imgur.com/wwqctxd.jpg
The Seth Base neuting power is 319 per Neut Versus an Ictus which is 407
Seth is 319 X 4 = 1276
Ictus is 407 X 3 = 1221
Seth neuts for more in critical mass.
So the next time you want to come in and call someone a liar have your facts straight before you spit propaganda.
Ville wrote:A) your more cap stable in a Seth due to leg slot
Heavy mech has more accumulator than a mech.
Ville wrote:B) range is longer
That's a complete lie.
Ville wrote:C) you have an additional neut
Ictus has bonus for neuting.
Ville wrote:D) the Ictus got directly screwed by all the trees now, thanks to LOS.
It's not just plants put landscape and structures. In any case, DPS has same LOS issues.
Stop trying to shift the meta to Ictus Online. Ictus has countless benefits over Seth. Use the tool that gets the job done.
Syndic wrote:In the current metagame, if the Devs touch EW even by the slightest percentage it will herald the arrival of the Ictus FOTM.
A) is True
B) I factor in locking range too, unlike Burial Because whats good 900 M optimal if you lock at 450? LOL
C) The Seth still neuts for more
Theres no shifting you know it got nerfed big time but you hate Ewar. So anything anti ewar you defend to the last drop.
You want Ictus buffed only for self-centered motives. I know the doctrine most of you trained towards that was supposed to be the EW meta killer.
You want Ictus buffed only for self-centered motives. I know the doctrine most of you trained towards that was supposed to be the EW meta killer.
You come into this thread and accuse me of lying. Then you post biased data. I prove you wrong.
Now you attack me personally. Let it go man.
Ictus has more neuting range than Seth and once stacking is fixed it's even better.
Go to test and try for yourself.
our doctrine is a well rounded team
silly
your doctrine is: 'derp'
You want Ictus buffed only for self-centered motives. I know the doctrine most of you trained towards that was supposed to be the EW meta killer.
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 3 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.
Generated in 0.045 seconds (85% PHP - 15% DB) with 22 queries